2017
DOI: 10.21608/ejdr.2017.5845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Environmental Evaluation for Grain Yield and Its Components of Quinoa Genotypes Across the North Western Coast of Egypt

Abstract: multi environmental trial involving five quinoa genotypes i.e., KVL-SRA2, KVL-SRA3, Regalona, Q-37 and Q-52 was conducted along the North Western Coast of Egypt. The eight tested environments included two sites in the first season of 2014/2015 i.e. irrigated Matrouh and rainfed Matrouh, while in the second season of 2015/2016 there were six sites including three rainfed sites of Ras El Hekma, El Neguilla and Matrouh as well as an irrigated site in Matrouh with three planting dates i.e., 1 Nov.,15 Nov., and 1 D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enhancement in phenolic compounds in quinoa seeds following MLE treatment observed in the current report is parallel with that obtained in fennel plants subjected to MLE addition [20]. El-Sadek [93] investigated the yield and yield components of five quinoa genotypes in eight different environments and found that the environmental impact was the main source of variance and attributed to 88.5% of the total variance in grain yield. Additionally, genotypes and the environment × genotype interaction accounted for only 5.46 and 6.06%, respectively of the total variance; consequently, he reported that in the field experiments, which include a wide range of environments (locations and seasons), random variation appears between those environments, and this is evident in breeding programs or assessment of crop varieties.…”
Section: Photochemical Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The enhancement in phenolic compounds in quinoa seeds following MLE treatment observed in the current report is parallel with that obtained in fennel plants subjected to MLE addition [20]. El-Sadek [93] investigated the yield and yield components of five quinoa genotypes in eight different environments and found that the environmental impact was the main source of variance and attributed to 88.5% of the total variance in grain yield. Additionally, genotypes and the environment × genotype interaction accounted for only 5.46 and 6.06%, respectively of the total variance; consequently, he reported that in the field experiments, which include a wide range of environments (locations and seasons), random variation appears between those environments, and this is evident in breeding programs or assessment of crop varieties.…”
Section: Photochemical Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this experiment quinoa was cultivated under irrigation. The crop is also established in some countries of the MENA region 42 , 55 , 61 , 82 . In fact, the stability of most parameters from one year to another facilitates the program of breeding for identifying a suitable genotype to grow in this region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively low yield obtained in our case can also be related to the low temperatures at the time of flowering. Despite, the adaptation of quinoa outside the Andes, a low temperature during flowering stage can significantly reduce grain yield 47 , 48 , 61 . In fact, low temperatures measured in the month of January and February has probably affected quinoa development which might be a reason for not yielding high scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, genotype JQ-02068 achieved the highest yield of 5132 kg ha −1 (Figure 1; Table 5). The difference in yield is because of the genotypic differences [44], environmental factors, and agricultural practices [42,45]. El-Sadek [45] identified that the environment could be the primary source of quinoa yield variations, accounting for 88.5% of the total variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%