2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2009.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-element and mineralogical analysis of mineral ores using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy and chemometric analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of geochemical fingerprinting holds that minerals form in certain structures according to sets of well-understood rules (i.e., mineral stoichiometry) and that the chemical composition of a mineral or rock reflects the geological environment and processes associated with its formation [81]. In an LIBS context, geochemical fingerprinting uses the totality of chemical information contained in a broadband emission spectrum to provide a qualitative compositional comparison and discrimination amongst a group of related samples through chemometric analysis of their LIBS spectra [69,[82][83][84][85][86]. As noted by Harmon et al [79], although elemental identification and quantification is a primary LIBS capability, geochemical fingerprinting by LIBS can also be readily used (i) to discriminate between rocks and minerals of similar appearance but different composition, (ii) for stratigraphic correlation of volcanic, sedimentary, or metamorphic rocks, and (iii) to determine geomaterial provenance when used in conjunction with statistical chemometric data processing techniques.…”
Section: Elemental Detection and Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of geochemical fingerprinting holds that minerals form in certain structures according to sets of well-understood rules (i.e., mineral stoichiometry) and that the chemical composition of a mineral or rock reflects the geological environment and processes associated with its formation [81]. In an LIBS context, geochemical fingerprinting uses the totality of chemical information contained in a broadband emission spectrum to provide a qualitative compositional comparison and discrimination amongst a group of related samples through chemometric analysis of their LIBS spectra [69,[82][83][84][85][86]. As noted by Harmon et al [79], although elemental identification and quantification is a primary LIBS capability, geochemical fingerprinting by LIBS can also be readily used (i) to discriminate between rocks and minerals of similar appearance but different composition, (ii) for stratigraphic correlation of volcanic, sedimentary, or metamorphic rocks, and (iii) to determine geomaterial provenance when used in conjunction with statistical chemometric data processing techniques.…”
Section: Elemental Detection and Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently the most common applications are material quality control in manufacturing and pharmaceutical settings (Sattman et al, 1995(Sattman et al, , 1998Zhang et al, 1999;Gruber et al, 2001;Noll et al, 2001;St-Onge et al, 2005). Increasingly, however, researchers are pushing the application boundaries of LIBS use, including environmental and geologic studies (Sirven et al, 2006;McMillan et al, 2007;Death et al, 2009;Gottfried et al, 2009;Pandhija et al, 2010;Pease, 2013). The growing interest in LIBS over a wide range of applications stems from its unique advantages over other analytical methods in that it is minimally destructive, requires little or no sample preparation, has a relatively low operational cost, and can analyze composition at pin-point locations as small as 0.1 mm.…”
Section: Libs Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different calibration curve approaches have been reported, including the use of line intensity [4]- [7], line intensity ratio between different elements [4], [8]- [10], linear correlation coefficient between the plasma spectrum to a standard spectrum [11], [12], or peak intensity to baseline ratio [13]. Calibration-free approach using Boltzmann plot [14]- [16], standard-less analysis approach by matching the experimental data to the theoretical model predictions [16], [17], and principal component analysis approach [18], [19] have also been reported. However, because of the uncertainty of the transition probability, nonlinear interaction between laser and material, sample heterogeneity, plasma in-homogeneity and matrix effect, laser induced plasma shows an intrinsic fluctuation, which normally results in 10 30% inaccuracy [20] and unsatisfactory repeatability of composition analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%