Abstract:Disrupted striatal functional connectivity is proposed to play a critical role in the development of psychotic symptoms. Previous resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) studies typically reported disrupted striatal connectivity in patients with psychosis and in individuals at clinical and genetic high risk of the disorder relative to healthy controls. This has not been widely studied in healthy individuals with subclinical psychotic-like experiences (schizotypy). Here we applied the emer… Show more
“…Several studies report reduced functional connectivity of striatal and cortical regions in association with (primarily positive) schizotypy, indicating an association of this dimension with striatal hypoconnectivity or cortico-striatal decoupling (Wang et al ., 2018; Waltmann et al ., 2019). Such dysconnectivity might be facilitated by altered striatal dopamine levels, as has been suggested based on results in animal studies (Grace et al ., 2007; Waltmann et al ., 2019). There is, in fact, evidence for striato-cortical decoupling associated with positive schizotypy being induced by altered dopaminergic neurotransmission (Rössler et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further evidence for the notion that brain networks, rather than single structures are involved in the generation of psychotic experiences comes from recent studies analysing resting state connectivity in schizotypy. Several studies report reduced functional connectivity of striatal and cortical regions in association with (primarily positive) schizotypy, indicating an association of this dimension with striatal hypoconnectivity or cortico-striatal decoupling (Wang et al ., 2018; Waltmann et al ., 2019). Such dysconnectivity might be facilitated by altered striatal dopamine levels, as has been suggested based on results in animal studies (Grace et al ., 2007; Waltmann et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, highlighting the role of the fronto-striatal network, positive and negative schizotypy have recently been associated with variations in cortico-striatal resting state functional connectivity (Rössler et al ., 2018; Wang et al ., 2018; Waltmann et al ., 2019). SPQ Disorganised has, furthermore, been associated with a higher availability of striatal dopamine (Chen et al ., 2012).…”
BackgroundSchizotypy, a putative schizophrenia endophenotype, has been associated with brain-structural variations partly overlapping with those in psychotic disorders. Variations in precuneus structure have been repeatedly reported, whereas the involvement of fronto-striatal networks – as in schizophrenia – is less clear. While shared genetic architecture is thought to increase vulnerability to environmental insults, beneficial factors like general intelligence might buffer their effect.MethodsTo further investigate the role of fronto-striatal networks in schizotypy, we examined the relationship of voxel- and surface-based brain morphometry and a measure of schizotypal traits (Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire, with subscores Cognitive-Perceptual, Interpersonal, Disorganised) in 115 healthy participants [54 female, mean age (s.d.) = 27.57(8.02)]. We tested intelligence (MWT-B) as a potential moderator.ResultsWe found a positive association of SPQ Cognitive-Perceptual with putamen volume (p = 0.040, FWE peak level-corrected), moderated by intelligence: with increasing IQ, the correlation of SPQ Cognitive-Perceptual and striatal volume decreased (p = 0.022). SPQ Disorganised was positively correlated with precentral volume (p = 0.013, FWE peak level-corrected). In an exploratory analysis (p < 0.001, uncorrected), SPQ total score was positively associated with gyrification in the precuneus and postcentral gyrus, and SPQ Disorganised was negatively associated with gyrification in the inferior frontal gyrus.ConclusionsOur findings support the role of fronto-striatal networks for schizotypal features in healthy individuals, and suggest that these are influenced by buffering factors like intelligence. We conclude that protective factors, like general cognitive capacity, might attenuate the psychosis risk associated with schizotypy. These results endorse the idea of a continuous nature of schizotypy, mirroring similar findings in schizophrenia.
“…Several studies report reduced functional connectivity of striatal and cortical regions in association with (primarily positive) schizotypy, indicating an association of this dimension with striatal hypoconnectivity or cortico-striatal decoupling (Wang et al ., 2018; Waltmann et al ., 2019). Such dysconnectivity might be facilitated by altered striatal dopamine levels, as has been suggested based on results in animal studies (Grace et al ., 2007; Waltmann et al ., 2019). There is, in fact, evidence for striato-cortical decoupling associated with positive schizotypy being induced by altered dopaminergic neurotransmission (Rössler et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further evidence for the notion that brain networks, rather than single structures are involved in the generation of psychotic experiences comes from recent studies analysing resting state connectivity in schizotypy. Several studies report reduced functional connectivity of striatal and cortical regions in association with (primarily positive) schizotypy, indicating an association of this dimension with striatal hypoconnectivity or cortico-striatal decoupling (Wang et al ., 2018; Waltmann et al ., 2019). Such dysconnectivity might be facilitated by altered striatal dopamine levels, as has been suggested based on results in animal studies (Grace et al ., 2007; Waltmann et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, highlighting the role of the fronto-striatal network, positive and negative schizotypy have recently been associated with variations in cortico-striatal resting state functional connectivity (Rössler et al ., 2018; Wang et al ., 2018; Waltmann et al ., 2019). SPQ Disorganised has, furthermore, been associated with a higher availability of striatal dopamine (Chen et al ., 2012).…”
BackgroundSchizotypy, a putative schizophrenia endophenotype, has been associated with brain-structural variations partly overlapping with those in psychotic disorders. Variations in precuneus structure have been repeatedly reported, whereas the involvement of fronto-striatal networks – as in schizophrenia – is less clear. While shared genetic architecture is thought to increase vulnerability to environmental insults, beneficial factors like general intelligence might buffer their effect.MethodsTo further investigate the role of fronto-striatal networks in schizotypy, we examined the relationship of voxel- and surface-based brain morphometry and a measure of schizotypal traits (Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire, with subscores Cognitive-Perceptual, Interpersonal, Disorganised) in 115 healthy participants [54 female, mean age (s.d.) = 27.57(8.02)]. We tested intelligence (MWT-B) as a potential moderator.ResultsWe found a positive association of SPQ Cognitive-Perceptual with putamen volume (p = 0.040, FWE peak level-corrected), moderated by intelligence: with increasing IQ, the correlation of SPQ Cognitive-Perceptual and striatal volume decreased (p = 0.022). SPQ Disorganised was positively correlated with precentral volume (p = 0.013, FWE peak level-corrected). In an exploratory analysis (p < 0.001, uncorrected), SPQ total score was positively associated with gyrification in the precuneus and postcentral gyrus, and SPQ Disorganised was negatively associated with gyrification in the inferior frontal gyrus.ConclusionsOur findings support the role of fronto-striatal networks for schizotypal features in healthy individuals, and suggest that these are influenced by buffering factors like intelligence. We conclude that protective factors, like general cognitive capacity, might attenuate the psychosis risk associated with schizotypy. These results endorse the idea of a continuous nature of schizotypy, mirroring similar findings in schizophrenia.
“…The first key finding to emerge was that, irrespective of whether brain damage was localized to frontal or non‐frontal neural structures, schizotypy levels were significantly elevated relative to controls. As noted earlier, this association between brain damage and schizotypy was predicted based on broader literature that has shown schizotypy to be linked to both structural and functional brain abnormalities in psychometrically defined schizotypy, subclinical psychosis, and psychiatric disorders (Asami et al, 2013; Ettinger, Meyhöfer, Steffans, Wagner, & Koutsouleris, 2014; Waltmann et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2015). However, as noted, because of the nature of these groups, these studies could not speak to whether there is a potential neurophysiological basis for schizotypal traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Schizotypy is characterized by the expression of attenuated psychotic‐like symptoms, with people who are higher in schizotypy exhibiting a range of neurocognitive impairments and neural abnormalities that are generally intermediate between individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls. This includes problems with executive control and memory that are sometimes accompanied by reduced brain activation (Ettinger et al, 2015), functional connectivity abnormalities (Waltmann et al, 2019), and subnormal levels of cortical suppression to specific types of auditory stimuli (Oestreich et al, 2016).…”
Objectives. Acquired brain damage is associated with a reduced capacity for empathy, and emerging evidence indicates that there may also be elevated levels of schizotypy. However, although a relationship between schizotypy and empathy has been identified in other populations, no study to date has tested whether this relationship is also evident following acquired brain damage, and if so, whether it is specific to certain types of brain damage, or specific types of empathy. Methods. People with acquired brain damage restricted to either frontal (N = 18) or non-frontal (N = 24) neural structures and demographically matched controls (N = 48) completed an assessment of schizotypy and a measure of empathy that differentiated between cognitive, emotional, and social skills empathy. Results. Relative to the control group, people with frontal and non-frontal brain injuries reported elevated schizotypy, with the frontal group also reporting lower social skills empathy. Only in the frontal group was there support for an association between schizotypy and empathy, and this was specific to the social skills component of empathy. Conclusions. Schizotypy levels are elevated following brain damage, and frontal brain injury is linked to greater difficulties with the social skills component of empathy. Schizotypy appears to be an important consideration when understanding the link between empathy and frontal brain damage, with higher schizotypy levels associated with reduced social skills empathy in this population. Future research is now needed to establish whether problems with more implicit aspects of social understanding are relevant to understanding the relationship between schizotypy and poor social behavioural outcomes identified in other clinical groups that present with frontal brain damage. Practitioner points People with an acquired brain injury experience deficits in empathic processing as well as elevated levels of schizotypal traits. Schizotypy levels and social skills empathy were inversely related in people who had experienced a frontal acquired brain injury, suggesting that schizotypy might be important for understanding social skill difficulties in this particular population. These findings highlight the potential benefit of including social cognitive assessments and schizotypy measures in standard neuropsychological assessment batteries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.