2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.746062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-domain ASON/GMPLS network operation: current status and future evolution

Abstract: This paper describes clarifications and comparisons of routing models for multi-domain optical networks as well as the current status and future perspective for ASON/GMPLS technologies. The three routing models, the per-domain routing, the ASON hierarchical routing, and the PCE-based routing, have been being standardized for the ASON/GMPLS multidomain networks. In this paper, we compare these three routing models in terms of path computation capabilities, on-line multiple path planning capability and inter-dom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, PCE-based routing model exhibits the better performance for computing optimal path routes that include those for backup paths, which can be done in parallel and hence the delay is minimized [14]. This paper adopts PCEbased routing, and distributed path computation is assumed since multiple carriers/domains are assumed.…”
Section: Pce-based Routing Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among them, PCE-based routing model exhibits the better performance for computing optimal path routes that include those for backup paths, which can be done in parallel and hence the delay is minimized [14]. This paper adopts PCEbased routing, and distributed path computation is assumed since multiple carriers/domains are assumed.…”
Section: Pce-based Routing Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Intelligently providing inter-domain connections across multi-domain optical networks is a complex problem [1][2][3] that becomes more difficult when transport devices are supplied by different equipment vendors (e.g., AlcatelLucent, Fiberhome, Huawei, ZTE) [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interdomain routing based on a path computation element (PCE) was proposed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), and it outperforms other mechanisms because of its high efficiency in interdomain path computation and considerable flexibility in system integration [3−8] . Backward recursive path computation (BRPC) is a regular procedure for interdomain routing processes, calculating optimal paths in a determined sequence of domains [9,10] . Hierarchical PCE architecture is then brought forward to improve performance given that this architecture enhances domain sequence determination [11−13] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%