2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7lc00382j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-dimensional studies of synthetic genetic promoters enabled by microfluidic impact printing

Abstract: Natural genetic promoters are regulated by multiple cis and trans regulatory factors. For quantitative studies of these promoters, the concentration of only a single factor is typically varied to obtain dose response or transfer function of the promoters with respect to the factor. Such design of experiments has limited our ability to understand quantitative, combinatorial interactions between multiple regulatory factors at promoters. The limitation is primarily due to the intractable number of experimental co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional repression assays and quantitative affinity measurements (Maerkl and Quake, 2007) were used to characterize a library of synthetic transcription factors, enabling gene regulatory networks to be built from purely synthetic parts de novo (Figure 3A). Another quantitative and multi-dimensional study of genetic promoters was carried out using parallel piezoelectric cantilever beams that were able to generate an array of droplets containing cell-free TX-TL reaction mixtures with highly accurate concentration gradients (Fan et al, 2017) (Figure 3A).…”
Section: Increased Throughput and Spatial Control Of Batch Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional repression assays and quantitative affinity measurements (Maerkl and Quake, 2007) were used to characterize a library of synthetic transcription factors, enabling gene regulatory networks to be built from purely synthetic parts de novo (Figure 3A). Another quantitative and multi-dimensional study of genetic promoters was carried out using parallel piezoelectric cantilever beams that were able to generate an array of droplets containing cell-free TX-TL reaction mixtures with highly accurate concentration gradients (Fan et al, 2017) (Figure 3A).…”
Section: Increased Throughput and Spatial Control Of Batch Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By example, Schwarz-Schilling et al ( 2016 ) produced functional AND gates and sender circuits in droplets containing cell free systems and bacteria. Fan et al ( 2017 ) use droplet microfluidics to print accurate and small quantities of cell free systems to measure interactions between three genetic factors at a synthetic promoter and used this data generate a model. Wang et al ( 2018 ) used a similar method, only combining a locked nucleic acid probe (measuring mRNA levels) with fluorescent proteins enabling simultaneous measurement of transcription and translation in massively parallel cell free droplet experiments.…”
Section: Test: High-throughput Circuit Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent in vitro display and microarray approaches have focused on increasing the range of applications and the screening of more complex biomolecules, such as membrane proteins and proteins that require multiple disulfide bonds. High-throughput screening of biomolecules using cell-free transcription and translation systems may be improved based on advances in several foundational technologies, including the development of better data analysis tools, the creation of new and improved cell-free protein expression systems ( 125 ), the advancement in automation of the screening processes ( 23 ) and further miniaturization to single molecule level that can still yield a detectable signal.…”
Section: Conclusion and Visionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of cell-free systems adds an additional layer of complexity due to the high diversity of molecules present in the analysis solution, the increased possibility of non-specific interactions with cellular components and the myriad ways of controlling protein expression. Despite this complexity, cell-free protein expression systems bring forth several advantages over conventional cell-based approaches, including the capability to express toxic or insoluble proteins ( 19 ), the incorporation of unnatural or isotope-labeled amino acids into the peptide chain ( 20 , 21 ), reduced processing time ( 22 ) and reaction volumes ( 23 ), as well as the lack of gene-cloning steps ( 24 ). These advantages make cell-free systems ideal for high-throughput applications ( 25 , 26 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%