Multi-dimensional potential factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine booster acceptance and hesitancy among university academic community in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional comparative study

Abstract

Background and aims Vaccination is the most powerful public health intervention proven to be safe and effective in the battle against the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Despite the potential therapeutic benefits of primer vaccine dosage regimens, public perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine booster dose (VBD) acceptance and hesitancy vary among various sub-group populations. This study investigates COVID-19 vaccine booster dose acceptance and compares the multi-dimensional potential factors influencing VBD acceptance and hesitancy among university teachers and the student community in Bangladesh. Methods This web-based cross-sectional study employed an anonymous, validated, and self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire items were adopted from a theoretical analysis of the recent relevant literature. The questionnaire was deployed in an on-line-enabled format (Google form) and conveniently distributed to 685 teachers and 990 students between 15th June, 2022 and 15th August, 2022 which resulted in the participation of 1250 (505 teachers vs.745 students) total respondents (response rate 73.72% vs. 75.25%) from various universities in Bangladesh. A non-parametric analytical tool (binary logistic regression) was applied to rationalize the study objectives and a Chi-squared test was performed to estimate the booster- hesitant risky group. Results The pooled COVID-19 vaccine booster dose acceptance rates were 84.6% (95% CI 81.5─87.7) and 67.2% (95% CI 63.8─70.6) for teachers and students in the university academic community, respectively. In employing a binary logistic regression, this study revealed that out of twelve (12)multi-dimensional key predictors, “equal safety”, “risk-benefit ratio”, and “variant control” had a significant positive association with VBD acceptance in both sets (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p = 0.005, respectively). Varied effects were found for several predictors; post-vaccination “side effects” had a significant negative association (p = 0.020) and “community protection” had significant positive association (p = 0.034) with vaccine booster dose acceptance in the teachers community while these variables were insignificant in the students cohort. “Trust” had a highly significant positive association (p = 0.000);“communication” and “academic attainment” had significant positive associations (p = 0.033 and 0.024, respectively) with VBD acceptance in the students cohort, while these predictors were insignificant in the teachers community. Women were more likely to receive a third dose of the vaccine (OR = 1.4 vs. 0.9 between teacher and student model); however, no significant association between gender and booster vaccine acceptance was found in a comparative Chi-squared model. Therefore, statistically, the booster vaccine-hesitant risky group was not found to implicate the massive booster vaccine drive among the university academic community. Conclusions COVID-19 booster vaccine acceptability among the student cohort was slightly lower than pre-roll-out intent. The teacher community was more inclined to get booster vaccinated. Moreover, differences were found between the multi-dimensional potential factors associated with VBD acceptance among teachers and students in university settings. This study explicitly confirmed positive attitudes toward the safety, health benefits, and variants control of the COVID-19 VBD under any circumstances. Post-vaccination side effect concern was found to be a barrier to administering booster shots and a reason for booster skepticism. Tailored communication and health education interventions need to be adopted to improve the public awareness of booster vaccine consequences, and limit booster skepticism.

Factors associated with intention to be vaccinated with the COVID-19 booster dose: a cross-sectional study in Peru

“…In our study, a high IBV with the booster dose has been observed (88.1%). This figure aligns with similar findings in other parts of the world, where participants have a strong willingness to receive the additional dose with values of 87% of adults in Denmark ( Jørgensen, Nielsen & Petersen, 2022 ), 82.5% of adults in Iran ( Askarian et al, 2023 ), 84.6% of adults in Bangladesh ( Roy, Azam & Islam, 2023 ), 81.2% individuals with chronic diseases in Malaysia ( Abdullah, Ching & Ali, 2023 ) and 82.8% in elderly individuals in China ( Qin et al, 2022b ). Furthermore, our results are comparable to those reported in Chile (88.2%).…”

Factors influencing Thai university students’ decisions to take COVID-19 vaccine booster doses: a cross-sectional survey

“…In similar studies around the world, varying proportions of acceptance of booster vaccines among university students have been reported, including 86.3% in Germany [ 27 ], 76.2% in Poland [ 28 ], and 67.2% in Bangladesh [ 29 ]. In comparison, the acceptance of booster doses observed in our study was relatively low.…”

Potential determinants of childhood COVID-19 vaccine confidence among the primary school's stakeholders in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study to assess the effects of education

“…Our study findings largely benefit the health policy makers and vaccine promoters to practice evidence-based promotional policies for involving child health during the COVID-19 vaccination programs thus insights better educational attainment in Bangladesh and other developing countries. As vaccine apprehension and confidence can alter over time among various sub-group population[ 49 50 ] with substantial regional variability[ 51 ], a long-term surveillance study would be adopted for monitoring upcoming childhood COVID-19 vaccine confidence and receptivity.…”