2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00023
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Dimensional Plant Element Stoichiometry—Looking Beyond Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus

Abstract: Nutrient elements are important for plant growth. Element stoichiometry considers the balance between different nutrients and how this balance is affected by the environment. So far, focus of plant stoichiometry has mainly been on the three elements carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P), but many additional elements are essential for proper plant growth. Our overall aim is to test the scaling relations of various additional elements (K, Ca, Mg, S, Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn), by using ten data sets from a range of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some genotypes, notably ‘Quarna’ and ‘Rohan’, increased their P pools strongly in proportion to N (strong P accumulators), whilst other genotypes, e.g., ‘Happy’ and ‘Alderon’, showed much weaker P accumulation in proportion to N (weak P accumulators) ( Figure 6 A). This indicates that there is genetic variation in the proportion of P to N accumulation across the plant material investigated here; and the negative scaling exponent for the niche volumes of N and P vs. the other nutrients [ 42 ] indicates that there is genetic variation also with respect to the proportional accumulation of other elements. It is interesting that the genotype ‘Happy’, with a weak P accumulation in proportion to N, and consequently the strongest deviation from an optimal P-to-N ratio ( Figure 7 C), was also the one with the smallest slope in the relationship between root and leaf development ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some genotypes, notably ‘Quarna’ and ‘Rohan’, increased their P pools strongly in proportion to N (strong P accumulators), whilst other genotypes, e.g., ‘Happy’ and ‘Alderon’, showed much weaker P accumulation in proportion to N (weak P accumulators) ( Figure 6 A). This indicates that there is genetic variation in the proportion of P to N accumulation across the plant material investigated here; and the negative scaling exponent for the niche volumes of N and P vs. the other nutrients [ 42 ] indicates that there is genetic variation also with respect to the proportional accumulation of other elements. It is interesting that the genotype ‘Happy’, with a weak P accumulation in proportion to N, and consequently the strongest deviation from an optimal P-to-N ratio ( Figure 7 C), was also the one with the smallest slope in the relationship between root and leaf development ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between whole plant biomass and N and P productivities (as the inverses of mass-based N and P concentrations) were analyzed by non-linear regression. The scaling relation between the stoichiometric niche volume of N and P on the one hand, and the volume of other nutrient elements on the other hand, were analyzed with reduced major axes (RMA) regression [ 42 , 65 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the core central tendency in N:P ratio is similar among observations in different biota, which could be due to the similar biochemical investment across all biota (Zhang and Elser, 2017). Apart from C, N, and P, a more complete understanding of homeostasis necessitates the consideration of other elements, especially the nutrient elements for plant growth (Jeyasingh et al, 2017;Ågren and Weih, 2020). Potassium (K) is the second most abundant nutrient in plant photosynthetic tissues and is required for many functions, such as the maintenance of electrical potentials across cell membranes (Britto and Kronzucker, 2008;Sardans and Peñuelas, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…2). Note that the maximum nitrogen concentration is larger than the critical nitrogen concentration, which allows M 3 to consider that crops can take up more nitrogen then they need to reach their maximum relative growth rate (Greenwood et al 1990;Justes et al 1994;Van Wijk et al 2003;Ågren 1988;Ågren and Weih 2020). If the crop nitrogen concentration drops below a so-called minimum nitrogen concentration, the actual daily biomass production is reduced to zero.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%