2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-day rTMS exerts site-specific effects on functional connectivity but does not influence associative memory performance

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the lack of changes in functional connectivity might reflect a site-specific property of the DLPFC. Site-specific changes in functional connectivity have been reported following rTMS (Cocchi et al, 2016; Castrillon et al, 2020; Hendrikse et al, 2020a), with certain studies reporting divergent changes in connectivity when identical forms of stimulation were applied across different cortical regions (Cocchi et al, 2016; Castrillon et al, 2020). Overall, this evidence suggests that the effects of rTMS on functional connectivity are highly variable and may not follow frequency-dependent conventions (e.g., reduced connectivity following 1 Hz rTMS and cTBS), particularly when stimulation is applied to non-motor regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, the lack of changes in functional connectivity might reflect a site-specific property of the DLPFC. Site-specific changes in functional connectivity have been reported following rTMS (Cocchi et al, 2016; Castrillon et al, 2020; Hendrikse et al, 2020a), with certain studies reporting divergent changes in connectivity when identical forms of stimulation were applied across different cortical regions (Cocchi et al, 2016; Castrillon et al, 2020). Overall, this evidence suggests that the effects of rTMS on functional connectivity are highly variable and may not follow frequency-dependent conventions (e.g., reduced connectivity following 1 Hz rTMS and cTBS), particularly when stimulation is applied to non-motor regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this study, we observed no change in local neural activity or GABA concentration, suggesting that cTBS may not have induced the significant local effects on DLPFC activity to influence connectivity across a wider network-scale. Further, personalised methods may not always enhance the reproducibility of rTMS effects (Hendrikse et al, 2020a). Finally, our working memory assessments occurred approximately 30-40 mins after stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By targeting a DMN component functionally connected to hippocampus, many researchers have applied rTMS to improve hippocampal-dependent memory function. In particular, Voss and colleagues have frequently demonstrated success using a paradigm involving 20 Hz rTMS to left AG at 100% RMT [12,13,[51][52][53][54]57,59]. The only significant source of heterogeneity within the application of this paradigm was the number of rTMS sessions applied.…”
Section: Rtms Of Other Frontal Lobe Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, Freedberg and colleagues observed that both three or four sessions of rTMS to left AG resulted in similar RSFC changes as when five stimulation sessions were applied, but did not assess changes in memory [59]. Surprisingly, Hendrikse and colleagues reported finding no significant cognitive benefit following four rTMS sessions [51]. To explore this potential minimum threshold, a dose-finding study was carried out by Freedberg and colleagues and discovered that a minimum of 5 rTMS sessions was required for significant change in RSFC reliably [50].…”
Section: Rtms Of Other Frontal Lobe Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the intrarater reliability of manual traced images, each subject's hippocampi were retraced from a structural T1‐weighted structural image acquired 1 week after the experimental assessment. T1‐images acquired at this follow‐up time point were acquired in the context of a separate study investigating the effects of 4 days of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on functional connectivity (see Hendrikse et al, 2020). The tracer was blinded to MRI assessment time points and hypotheses pertaining to this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%