2013 Eleventh Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust 2013
DOI: 10.1109/pst.2013.6596061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-data-types interval decision diagrams for XACML evaluation engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another context related to policy evaluation for efficient decision process, few approaches have been proposed such [22][23][24][25]. Based on the study of the current literature, it is trivial that both domains are still and will continue to be a challenging niche for researchers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another context related to policy evaluation for efficient decision process, few approaches have been proposed such [22][23][24][25]. Based on the study of the current literature, it is trivial that both domains are still and will continue to be a challenging niche for researchers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers recently analyzed the effects of policy evaluation performance and highlighted its relation to the used attributes and attribute values [32]. Regarding attribute constraints, Bijon et al, for instance, introduce constraints on attribute assignments and values [6].…”
Section: Attribute Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the XACML evaluation process [12] [17], there has been three-valued logic to determine policy decisions [8]. Therefore it defines the three-valued logic as L3= (V3, ≤)where the V3 is the set ( T, N, I) and N≤I≤T.…”
Section: The Three -Valued Logic In Xacmlmentioning
confidence: 99%