Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Politics, Elections and Data 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2508436.2508439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-cycle forecasting of congressional elections with social media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fink et al 2013;O'Connor et al 2010;Shi et al 2012), the share data in their relationship to various metrics of electoral success (e.g. Diaz et al 2014;Huberty 2013;Jungherr et al 2012). This has led various researchers to emphasize that case studies seemingly successful in finding a statistical relationship between some metrics in Twitter data and some metrics of electoral success should not be taken as indicators for the generalizability of their findings (e.g.…”
Section: Predicting Election Results Using Twitter Data: the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fink et al 2013;O'Connor et al 2010;Shi et al 2012), the share data in their relationship to various metrics of electoral success (e.g. Diaz et al 2014;Huberty 2013;Jungherr et al 2012). This has led various researchers to emphasize that case studies seemingly successful in finding a statistical relationship between some metrics in Twitter data and some metrics of electoral success should not be taken as indicators for the generalizability of their findings (e.g.…”
Section: Predicting Election Results Using Twitter Data: the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diaz et al 2014;Gayo-Avello et al 2011;Huberty 2013;Jungherr 2013;Jungherr et al 2012;Metaxas et al 2011).…”
Section: Twitter and Political Coverage By Traditional Mediaunclassified
“…DiGrazia et al (2013) suggested that metrics based on message volumes alone could contribute value to forward-looking election predictions in US House races. However, Huberty (2013) shows that such volume metrics do not contribute any predictive value above and beyond a candidate's prior vote share when they are employed in true forward-looking electoral forecasts. The complexity of political speechparticularly on Twitter, where the 140 character limit leads to unique grammar -should throw doubt on the ability of such simple metrics to tease out real voter sentiment or intent.…”
Section: Forecasting the Politicalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This necessarily leads to a rather limited number of observations which can serve as the basis for establishing a statistical relationship between Twitter messages and election results. This limits the potential for establishing a valid statistical relationship between the two metrics (Diaz et al 2014;Huberty 2013).…”
Section: Politics Through the Lens Of Digital Trace Datamentioning
confidence: 99%