2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria selection of an Air Quality Model configuration based on quantitative and linguistic evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, accurate meteorological fields are of utmost importance. They will lead to reliable forecasts of air pollution events (Almanza et al 2014).…”
Section: Data Gathering and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, accurate meteorological fields are of utmost importance. They will lead to reliable forecasts of air pollution events (Almanza et al 2014).…”
Section: Data Gathering and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a novel conjunctive MCDM approach that combines AHP and TOPSIS order was employed to develop an innovation support system that considers the interdependence of higher education institutes to comprehensively evaluate their innovation performance [39]. Another study presented the application of multi-criteria evaluation in the selection of an optimal allocation for an air quality model [40], which was developed to support managers in exploring the strengths and weaknesses of each alternative. This approach identifies a preferred result based on the integration of Bayesian networks and fuzzy logic to rank and evaluate suppliers [41].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOPSIS was used to evaluate sustainable development in livable city [21], and the results suggested that the social, economic, and environmental factors have important influences on liveable cities. Reference [22] presented a multicriteria evaluation for the selection of the optimal configuration of an air quality model. Additionally, some scholars developed support methods to explore the strengths and weaknesses of various alternatives and identified the preferred result based on the integration of Bayesian networks and fuzzy logic to rank and evaluate suppliers [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%