2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria, multi-objective and uncertainty analysis for agro-energy spatial modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One specific approach to uncertainty analysis applicable to MCDA is to gain a sense of error or uncertainty in the predictions, given the uncertainty in the criterion weights (BENKE & PELIZARO 2010, FEIZIZADEH & BLASCHKE 2014. It is believed that it is essential to handle GIS-MCDA errors and uncertainty in decision-making, particularly when decisions are based on probabilistic ranges rather than on deterministic results (TENERELLI & CARVER 2012, FEIZIZADEH et al 2014a. MCDA uncertainty analysis embraces issues beyond traditional risk definitions.…”
Section: Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Approach For Gis-mcda Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One specific approach to uncertainty analysis applicable to MCDA is to gain a sense of error or uncertainty in the predictions, given the uncertainty in the criterion weights (BENKE & PELIZARO 2010, FEIZIZADEH & BLASCHKE 2014. It is believed that it is essential to handle GIS-MCDA errors and uncertainty in decision-making, particularly when decisions are based on probabilistic ranges rather than on deterministic results (TENERELLI & CARVER 2012, FEIZIZADEH et al 2014a. MCDA uncertainty analysis embraces issues beyond traditional risk definitions.…”
Section: Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Approach For Gis-mcda Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations performed in [19] also allowed to determine the criteria that were particularly sensitive to such variations. In [20] a method for determining the suitability of sites for conversion to perennial bioenergy crops is introduced. A simulation approach was applied to evaluate the influence of uncertainty of the input data and parameters on the model behaviour and outcomes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AESC management requires to analyze the problems inherent production, processing, logistics (harvesting, transport and storage), marketing and channel diversifications, and the most efficient organization in order to coordinate the vertical integration and impose the hierarchical decisions to the member (Menard and Valceschini, 2005), in an environment characterized by the asymmetric distribution of information among partners and contingent risks caused by production and markets (Epperson and Estes, 1999). For this purposes, the spatial distribution of biomass and supply must be compatible with the demand and costs (production, processing, transport and distribution) (Grassano et al, 2011;Tenerelli and Carver, 2012). This paper proposes an integrated and interdisciplinary approach to planning the biofuel supply chain at a regional level aimed to evaluate the potential use of the land for the energy production and side effects, to supply the existing processing plants and accomplish with the economic, energy and environmental targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing demand for energy and expected shortage in the long term, solicit new energy strategies to fill the increasing demand-supply gap (European Commission, 2009;Tenerelli and Carver, 2012). European Commission intends to implement these strategies in a contest where the environmental and social goals are considered as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%