2003
DOI: 10.2737/ne-gtr-307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision models for forestry and natural resources management: an annotated bibliography

Abstract: Foresters and natural resource managers must balance conflicting objectives when developing land-management plans. Conflicts may encompass economic, environmental, social, cultural, technical, and aesthetic objectives. Selecting the best combination of management uses from numerous objectives is difficult and challenging. Multi-Criteria Decision Models (MCDM) provide a systematic means for comparing tradeoffs and selecting alternatives that best satisfy the decisionmaker's objectives. First developed during Wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The result has been that the primary objective is a commodity focus such as maximizing the net present value of future timber harvests, where conservation goals are simply entered as constraints (e.g., Endangered Species Act requirements and Wilderness area acreage). The resulting modeler bias, along with spatial limitations and missing biophysical response measurements make linear programming models incapable of capturing the total economic value of management decisions (Morton 1999) and have contributed to a publicly perceived "black box" approach to forest management (de Steiguer et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result has been that the primary objective is a commodity focus such as maximizing the net present value of future timber harvests, where conservation goals are simply entered as constraints (e.g., Endangered Species Act requirements and Wilderness area acreage). The resulting modeler bias, along with spatial limitations and missing biophysical response measurements make linear programming models incapable of capturing the total economic value of management decisions (Morton 1999) and have contributed to a publicly perceived "black box" approach to forest management (de Steiguer et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques may also be used within a multi-criteria decision analysis framework to help assess strategies and plans (e.g. Díaz-Balteiro and Romero, 2008;De Steiguer et al, 2003;Sheppard and Meitner, 2005;Tecle et al, 1998;Schmoldt et al, 2001;Nordström et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies applying LGP include Chisman and Rippy (1979), Kao and Brodie (1979), and Marten and Sancholuz (1982), while those applying WGP include Dane et al (1977), Bazaraa and Bouzaher (1981), and Sandiford (1986). Several reviews have been published over the last decades to survey applications of GP in the natural resource management field; among others, a discussion of earlier works can be found in Romero and Rehman (1987) while discussions of more recent studies can be found in Steiguer et al (2003) and Mendoza and Martins (2006). We thus restrict our discussion to applications published over the last ten years or so.…”
Section: Applications In Strategic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%