2022
DOI: 10.1108/ijqrm-03-2020-0065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision model for risk prioritisation involving multiple decision-makers: an application of composition of probabilistic preferences combined with FMEA in the supply chain

Abstract: PurposeThe paper aims to propose a multi-criteria model for risk prioritisation associated to supply chain management involving multiple decision-makers.Design/methodology/approachThe model integrates the composition of probabilistic preferences (CPP) on the failure modes analysis and its effects (FMEA) criteria. First, the authors carried out a probabilistic transformation of the numerical evaluations of the multiple decision-makers on the FMEA criteria regarding the internal risks that affect the chain of cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are cost/benefit analysis, business impact analysis, scenario analysis, environmental risk assessment, FMEA, and analysis of cause and consequence. FMEA is a widely accepted risk analysis framework among all these methodologies due to its viability and applicability (Casado et al, 2023;Gupta and Mishra, 2017). It has been widely practiced to evaluate a system or product's potential failure modes, identify their root-causes and effects, and confirm the prioritization of losses that follow (Fattahi et al, 2020;Adar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are cost/benefit analysis, business impact analysis, scenario analysis, environmental risk assessment, FMEA, and analysis of cause and consequence. FMEA is a widely accepted risk analysis framework among all these methodologies due to its viability and applicability (Casado et al, 2023;Gupta and Mishra, 2017). It has been widely practiced to evaluate a system or product's potential failure modes, identify their root-causes and effects, and confirm the prioritization of losses that follow (Fattahi et al, 2020;Adar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are cost/benefit analysis, business impact analysis, scenario analysis, environmental risk assessment, FMEA, and analysis of cause and consequence. FMEA is a widely accepted risk analysis framework among all these methodologies due to its viability and applicability (Casado et al. , 2023; Gupta and Mishra, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…all kinds of corrections, and new solutions) that will contribute to the effective elimination of sources of defects. The most important benefits related to the implementation of the FMEA analysis include (Casado et al, 2023;Velasquez & Lara, 2017):…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%