2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a suitable biomass material for maximum bio-oil yield during pyrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the test results calculated based on the accuracy calculation, the system accuracy results are 75%. To test the level of ranking correlation using the rank spearman [34]. From the difference in rank d = 2 from the amount of data n = 8 results in rs = 0.95.…”
Section: Conduct Ranking the Land Alternative With Electre Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the test results calculated based on the accuracy calculation, the system accuracy results are 75%. To test the level of ranking correlation using the rank spearman [34]. From the difference in rank d = 2 from the amount of data n = 8 results in rs = 0.95.…”
Section: Conduct Ranking the Land Alternative With Electre Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the method of TOPSIS (Lengacher & Cammarata, 2012), the weights and performance ratings of the criteria are specified as precise values. Recently, numerous stimulating studies have attentive to the TOPSIS method and applied it in many areas, including financial performance evaluation, company evaluation, ranking the carrier alternatives, and material selection (Madhu, Dhanalakshmi, & Mathew, 2020). Instances of these can be found in the literature such as open‐source EMR software packages (Zaidan et al, 2015), ERP software selection (Huiqun and Guang, 2012), and so forth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to this trend, several policies, such as the ‘The European Bioeconomy in 2030’ described in the European Union White Paper, the ‘National Bioeconomy Blueprint’ published by the USA White House in 2012 [8] and the ‘13 th Five‐Year Plan for Biomass Energy Development’ established by the Chinese National Energy Administration in 2016, have been proposed. Currently, the strategies for biomass reforming predominantly involve pyrolysis, [9,10] thermocatalytic conversion, [11,12] biocatalysis, [13,14] electrocatalysis [15,16] or photocatalysis [17–19] . Notably, biomass pyrolysis has been widely considered as one of the most promising technologies for biomass reforming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%