Multi-criteria decision-making for coronavirus disease 2019 applications: a theoretical analysis review

Alsalem, M. A.; Alamoodi, A. H.; Albahri, O. S.; Dawood, Kareem Abbas; Mohammed, R. T.; Alnoor, Alhamzah; Zaidan, A. A.; Albahri, A. S.; Zaidan, B. B.; Jumaah, F. M.; Al‐Obaidi, Jameel R.

doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10124-x

Cited by 54 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 100 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This study used a style of systematic reviews and metaanalyses guidelines illustrated in Figure 1 [27][28][29][30][31][32]. In literature reviews, researchers must search more than one database, not just one related database, to cover the most related articles.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnosis-Based Hybridization of Multimedical Tests and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review

Alqaysi

Albahri

Hamid

2022

International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurobehavioral condition that begins in childhood and continues throughout life, affecting communication and verbal and behavioral skills. It is challenging to discover autism in the early stages of life, which prompted researchers to intensify efforts to reach the best solutions to treat this challenge by introducing artificial intelligence (AI) techniques and machine learning (ML) algorithms, which played an essential role in greatly assisting the medical and healthcare staff and trying to obtain the highest predictive results for autism spectrum disorder. This study is aimed at systematically reviewing the literature related to the criteria, including multimedical tests and sociodemographic characteristics in AI techniques and ML contributions. Accordingly, this study checked the Web of Science (WoS), Science Direct (SD), IEEE Xplore digital library, and Scopus databases. A set of 944 articles from 2017 to 2021 is collected to reveal a clear picture and better understand all the academic literature through a definitive collection of 40 articles based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected articles were divided based on similarity, objective, and aim evidence across studies. They are divided into two main categories: the first category is “diagnosis of ASD based on questionnaires and sociodemographic features” ( n = 39 ). This category contains a subsection that consists of three categories: (a) early diagnosis of ASD towards analysis, (b) diagnosis of ASD towards prediction, and (c) diagnosis of ASD based on resampling techniques. The second category consists of “diagnosis ASD based on medical and family characteristic features” ( n = 1 ). This multidisciplinary systematic review revealed the taxonomy, motivations, recommendations, and challenges of diagnosis ASD research in utilizing AI techniques and ML algorithms that need synergistic attention. Thus, this systematic review performs a comprehensive science mapping analysis and identifies the open issues that help accomplish the recommended solution of diagnosis ASD research. Finally, this study critically reviews the literature and attempts to address the diagnosis ASD research gaps in knowledge and highlights the available ASD datasets, AI techniques and ML algorithms, and the feature selection methods that have been collected from the final set of articles.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnosis-Based Hybridization of Multimedical Tests and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review

Alqaysi

Albahri

Hamid

2022

International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Risk-taking proclivity refers to the unpleasant processes that underpin a behavioral proclivity to take risks in response to signals of possible reward, which also carries a chance of adverse consequences (Moreno-Padilla et al, 2018). A venture's strategic decisions in this context relate to risk-taking on uncertain results (Alsalem et al, 2022;R. Wang & Sui., 2019).…”

Section: Risk-takingmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Crisis Management, Risk-Taking, and Innovation in Sustainability Practices: Empirical Evidence From Iraq

Zaidan

Khaw

Alnoor

2022

IJIKM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim/Purpose: This study examines the impact of decision-making, crisis management, and decision-making on sustainability through the mediation of open innovation in the energy sector. Background: Public companies study high-performance practices, requiring overcoming basic obstacles such as financial crises that prevent the adoption and development of sustainability programs. Methodology: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to the closure of businesses in Iraq, a survey was distributed. To facilitate responses, free consultations were offered to help complete the questionnaire quickly. Of the 435 questionnaires answered, 397 were used for further analysis. Contribution: The impact of crises that impede the energy sector from adopting sustainable environmental regulations is investigated in this study. Its identification of specific constraints to open innovation leads to the effectiveness of adopting environmentally friendly policies and reaching high levels of sustainable performance. Findings: The impacts of risk-taking, crisis management, and decision-making on sustainability have been explored. Results show that open innovation fully mediates the relationship between the factors of risk-taking, crisis management, decision-making, and sustainability. Recommendations for Practitioners: The proposed model can be used by practitioners to develop and improve sustainable innovation practices and achieve superior performance. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers are recommended to conduct in-depth studies of the phenomenon based on theoretical and empirical foundations, especially in light of the relationship between crisis management, decision-making, and risk-taking and their impact on sustainability based on linear and non-compensatory relationships. Impact on Society: This study provides a reference for organizations with similar cultural backgrounds in adopting sustainable practices to minimize pollution in the Iraqi context. Future Research: A more in-depth study can be performed using a larger sample, which not only includes the energy industry but also other industries.

show abstract

“…A technique for evaluating options based on distinct, sometimes contradictory criteria and merging them into a single overall evaluation" [35,36]. MCDM is an umbrella term for a collection of formal techniques that strive to explicitly account for many factors when assisting individuals or groups in evaluating important decisions [37][38][39]. Numerous subjective weighting methods have been proposed; however, when it comes to weighting criteria, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [40][41][42][43][44] and best-worst method (BWM) [45,46] methods have a high success rate.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Diagnosis Models for Autism Patients Based on Medical and Sociodemographic Features Using Machine Learning and Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Techniques: An Evaluation and Benchmarking Framework

Alqaysi

Albahri

Hamid

2022

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Contexts. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is difficult to diagnose, prompting researchers to increase their efforts to find the best diagnosis by introducing machine learning (ML). Recently, several available challenges and issues have been highlighted for the diagnosis of ASD. High consideration must be taken into the feature selection (FS) approaches and classification process simultaneously by using medical tests and sociodemographic characteristic features in autism diagnostic. The constructed ML models neglected the importance of medical tests and sociodemographic features in a training and evaluation dataset, especially since some features have different contributions to the processing data and possess more relevancies to the classification information than others. However, the role of the physician’s experience towards feature contributions remains limited. In addition, the presence of many evaluation criteria, criteria trade-offs, and criteria importance categorize the evaluation and benchmarking of diagnosis ML models concerning the intersection between FS approaches and ML classification methods given under complex multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. To date, no study has presented an evaluation framework for benchmarking the best hybrid diagnosis models to classify autism patients’ emergency levels considering multicriteria evaluation solutions. Method. The three-phase framework integrated the MCDM and ML to develop the diagnosis models and evaluate and benchmark the best. Firstly, the new ASD-dataset-combined medical tests and sociodemographic characteristic features is identified and preprocessed. Secondly, developing the hybrid diagnosis models using the intersection process between three FS techniques and five ML algorithms introduces 15 models. The selected medical tests and sociodemographic features from each FS technique are weighted before feeding the five ML algorithms using the fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency (FWZIC) method based on four psychiatry experts. Thirdly, (i) formulate a dynamic decision matrix for all developed models based on seven evaluation metrics, including classification accuracy, precision, F1 score, recall, test time, train time, and AUC. (ii) The fuzzy decision by opinion score method (FDOSM) is used to evaluate and benchmark the 15 models concerning the seven evaluation metrics. Results. Results reveal that (i) the three FS techniques have obtained a size different from the others in the number of the selected features; the sets were 39, 38, and 41 out of 48 features. Each set has its weights constructed by FWIZC. Considered sociodemographic features have been mostly selected more than medical tests within FS techniques. (ii) The first three best hybrid models were “ReF-decision tree,” “IG-decision tree,” and “Chi2-decision tree,” with score values 0.15714, 0.17539, and 0.29444. The best diagnosis model (ReF-decision tree) has obtained 0.4190, 0.0030, 0.9946, 0.9902, 0.9902, 0.9902, 0.9902, and 0.9951 for the C1=train time, C2=test time, C3=AUC, C4=CA, C5=F1 score, C6=precision, and C7=recall, respectively. The developed framework would be beneficial in advancing, accelerating, and selecting diagnosis tools in therapy with ASD. The selected model can identify severity as light, medium, or intense based on medical tests and sociodemographic weighted features.

show abstract

Multi-criteria decision-making for coronavirus disease 2019 applications: a theoretical analysis review

Cited by 54 publications

References 100 publications

Diagnosis-Based Hybridization of Multimedical Tests and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review

Diagnosis-Based Hybridization of Multimedical Tests and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review

The Influence of Crisis Management, Risk-Taking, and Innovation in Sustainability Practices: Empirical Evidence From Iraq

Hybrid Diagnosis Models for Autism Patients Based on Medical and Sociodemographic Features Using Machine Learning and Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Techniques: An Evaluation and Benchmarking Framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About