2017
DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2017.3.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision making approach for the selection of software effort estimation model

Abstract: Software development with minimum effort has become a challenging task for the software developers. Software effort may be defined as the prediction process of the effort required to develop any software. Many software effort estimation models have been developed in the past, but it is observed that none of them can be applied successfully in all kinds of projects in different environments that raise the problem of the software effort estimation model selection. To select the suitable software effort estimatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be untoward or improper for DMs to choose optimal or receivable alternatives. The weighted distance‐based approximation (WDBA), first proposed by Rao and Singh, is a befitting algorithm to process the information in a rational and resultful way …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be untoward or improper for DMs to choose optimal or receivable alternatives. The weighted distance‐based approximation (WDBA), first proposed by Rao and Singh, is a befitting algorithm to process the information in a rational and resultful way …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…information in a rational and resultful way. [43][44][45][46] Hence, the first motivation of this paper is to deal the MADM issues by proposing new decision-making algorithm out of two drawbacks. 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Konsep dasar dari metode SAW adalah mencari hasil penjumlahan terbobot dari peringkat setiap alternatif untuk semua atribut. MADM merupakan metode pengambilan keputusan dari sejumlah alternatif untuk menetapkan alternatif terbaik berdasarkan beberapa kriteria dan bobot tertentu (Shafiee, Saffarian, & Zaredar, 2015), (Bansal, Kumar, & Garg, 2017). Metode SAW menghasilkan alternatif pilihan terbaik, dengan hitungan yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara matematis.…”
Section: A Simple Additive Weighting (Saw)unclassified
“…This paper used AHP method as the simplest technique of ranking. However, during the past few years, there have been other competitive techniques which can be used for ranking alternatives such as weighted distance-based approximation (WDBA) and distance-based approximation (DBA) method [62][63][64], Euclidean Distance Based Approximation (EDBA) [65], Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and fuzzy set theory (FST) [66][67][68], Visekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) MCDM method [69], Fuzzy Set Theory and Weighted Distance Based Approximation [70], Fuzzy-TOPSIS (F-TOPSIS) and TOPSIS method [71,72], Fuzzy Distance Based Approach (FDBA)' method [73], fuzzy-based matrix methodology [74], Fuzzy Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) [75], Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP), COPRAS, VIKOR, WDBA [76], Hybrid MCDM methods [77] and fuzzy ELECTRE approach [78]. Table 1.…”
Section: Critical Success Factors Determination While Assessing the Nmentioning
confidence: 99%