2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12960-021-00671-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-country case studies on planning RMNCH services using WISN methodology: Bangladesh, Ghana, Kenya, Sultanate of Oman and Papua New Guinea

Abstract: Background Globally, many countries are adopting evidence-based workforce planning that facilitates progress towards achieving sustainable development goals for reproductive, maternal newborn and child health. We reviewed case studies on workforce planning for reproductive maternal newborn child health services at primary care level facilities using workload indicators of staffing need in five countries. Method Using available workload indicators f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workload pressure among midwives in the study facility was found to be a WISN ratio of 0.8. This was higher than the results obtained by a research including Ugandan midwives (0.53.-0.67), Bangladeshi nurses (0.69), Indonesia (0.64) and Indian midwives (0.57) but it is lower than those obtained by a study that included Greek midwives (1.33–1.83), Guinean midwives (1.00) and Filipino midwives (0.71–6.09) [ 9 11 , 19 , 30 , 31 ]. The variation may be a result of sociocultural and political differences as well as facility service variations but in the case of Bangladesh results, cadre differences should be taken into consideration before interpreting the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The workload pressure among midwives in the study facility was found to be a WISN ratio of 0.8. This was higher than the results obtained by a research including Ugandan midwives (0.53.-0.67), Bangladeshi nurses (0.69), Indonesia (0.64) and Indian midwives (0.57) but it is lower than those obtained by a study that included Greek midwives (1.33–1.83), Guinean midwives (1.00) and Filipino midwives (0.71–6.09) [ 9 11 , 19 , 30 , 31 ]. The variation may be a result of sociocultural and political differences as well as facility service variations but in the case of Bangladesh results, cadre differences should be taken into consideration before interpreting the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%