2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-01734-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Core Cache Hierarchies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 228 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper focuses on explicitly managed memory hierarchies, where copies across the hierarchy are handled by DMAEs. We refer the interested reader to [6], [7], [8], [9] for excellent surveys on cache-based memory systems. Caches and DMAEs often coexist in modern computing systems as they address different application needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper focuses on explicitly managed memory hierarchies, where copies across the hierarchy are handled by DMAEs. We refer the interested reader to [6], [7], [8], [9] for excellent surveys on cache-based memory systems. Caches and DMAEs often coexist in modern computing systems as they address different application needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, private caches are still needed to keep the average latency low, which leads to cache hierarchy and the use of some coherence protocol, usually involving some degree of cache inclusion. The cache hierarchy design of a multicore CPU is, therefore, a problem with many variables [Balasubramonian, Jouppi, Muralimanohar, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, chip multiprocessor (CMP) systems dominate the market in high-performance servers, desktop or embedded systems, and mobile devices [3]. Their most common design includes a multilevel cache hierarchy, ending with a shared last-level cache (SLLC) [4]. Looking specifically at the current top 10 supercomputers [5], all but one of them include general-purpose CMPs that have a multilevel cache: ARM A64FX [6], IBM Power9 [7], AMD EPYC [8] and Intel Xeon [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 4. Mean SLLC miss rate for step 1 of NOPTb-miss (labelled as iteration 0) and several iterations of step 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%