2010
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2010.5595612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Channel SAR-GMTI Method Robust to Coregistration Error of SAR Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 as an example, we assume that there is no coregistration error in the azimuth direction, the number of the neighbouring pixels used to construct the joint complex interferometric phase data vector is 3 and the processing pixel in the interferograms is marked as (i, j). The joint complex D-InSAR phase data vector jp(i, j) similar to the data vector constructed in [11,16,17], can be formulated as…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1 as an example, we assume that there is no coregistration error in the azimuth direction, the number of the neighbouring pixels used to construct the joint complex interferometric phase data vector is 3 and the processing pixel in the interferograms is marked as (i, j). The joint complex D-InSAR phase data vector jp(i, j) similar to the data vector constructed in [11,16,17], can be formulated as…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that in [11,16,17] the data vector is directly formulated by the SAR complex image data, whereas the joint complex D-InSAR phase data vector jp(i, j) in our approach is formulated by complex interferograms. Therefore for D-InSAR processing the SAR images need to be coarsely coregistered firstly.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations