2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06521-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-center evaluation of artificial intelligent imaging and clinical models for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer

Abstract: Background:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plays an important role in the management of locally advanced breast cancer. It allows for downstaging of tumours, potentially allowing for breast conservation. NAC also allows for in-vivo testing of the tumours' response to chemotherapy and provides important prognostic information. There are currently no clearly de ned clinical models that incorporate imaging with clinical data to predict response to NAC. Thus, the aim of this work is to develop a predictive AI model… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that Ki-67 index was a significant predictor of pCR status in the TC (Supplementary Figure S7A), and it was used to construct the clinical model as a baseline. Consistent with previous studies, 32 , 33 the performance of clinical models in predicting pCR was unsatisfactory, with AUC values of 0.588 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.521, 0.655), 0.524 (95%CI: 0.425, 0.622), and 0.540 (95%CI: 0.437, 0.643) in the three cohorts. (Supplementary Table S3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that Ki-67 index was a significant predictor of pCR status in the TC (Supplementary Figure S7A), and it was used to construct the clinical model as a baseline. Consistent with previous studies, 32 , 33 the performance of clinical models in predicting pCR was unsatisfactory, with AUC values of 0.588 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.521, 0.655), 0.524 (95%CI: 0.425, 0.622), and 0.540 (95%CI: 0.437, 0.643) in the three cohorts. (Supplementary Table S3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Some difficulties have been recently overcome thanks to deep learning, such as time-consuming manual labeling, inconsistent DCE-MRI protocols, etc. Furthermore, fully automatic segmentation is not restricted to intratumoral features, breast tissue [ 40 ] and peritumoral [ 41 ] can also give an early prediction. This is the direction of our further efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the relatively mature static image radiomics studies, there are technical difficulties in applying static image radiomics analysis methods to video analysis with a length of more than 1 min (4). Given that the practice of medicine is constantly evolving in response to new technology, there is interest in using the latest imaging methods to obtain data for radiomics learning (5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%