2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23083968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Camera-Based Sorting System for Surface Defects of Apples

Abstract: In this paper, we addressed the challenges in sorting high-yield apple cultivars that traditionally relied on manual labor or system-based defect detection. Existing single-camera methods failed to uniformly capture the entire surface of apples, potentially leading to misclassification due to defects in unscanned areas. Various methods were proposed where apples were rotated using rollers on a conveyor. However, since the rotation was highly random, it was difficult to scan the apples uniformly for accurate cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To simulate real-world apple defects precise inspection, we collected a dataset of apple defects named Surface Defective Apple (SDA) as presented in our previous work 42 . This dataset includes images containing diverse shapes and sizes of distinct defects defined based on their surface presence, such as irregular patterns and morphological or physiological anomalies.…”
Section: Surface Subtle Defects Apple(ssda) Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate real-world apple defects precise inspection, we collected a dataset of apple defects named Surface Defective Apple (SDA) as presented in our previous work 42 . This dataset includes images containing diverse shapes and sizes of distinct defects defined based on their surface presence, such as irregular patterns and morphological or physiological anomalies.…”
Section: Surface Subtle Defects Apple(ssda) Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metrics were based on the number of true positives (TP), false positives (FP), true negatives (TN), and false negatives (FN) from the obtained confusion matrixes after each classification. Among existing metrics, the selected ones based on literature [38] were precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy, as shown in Equations ( 2)-( 5):…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%