“…Both PFSA-based and HC-based PEMs consist of phase-separated hydrophilic and hydrophobic domains, providing ion-conducting path and mechanical robustness, respectively, to the PEM. Under humid conditions, phase separation is significantly enhanced by the absorption of water molecules into the hydrophilic domains. − Generally, PFSA-based PEMs, known for their excellent phase separation, feature wide water channels with continuous hydrophilic pathways. − In contrast, HC-based PEMs exhibit smaller water channels, and the partitioning difference between hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments is less pronounced due to the rigidity caused by the aromatic backbone. , Because of these differences, HC-based PEMs show less distinct phase separation and a larger average spacing between neighboring hydrophilic domains compared to PFSA-based PEMs. − Therefore, in electrochemical applications, HC-based PEMs require higher sulfonic acid group capacity (>∼1.8 mmol/g) to achieve cell performance similar to that of Nafion. − As a result, they absorb more water and exhibit greater areal expansion in aqueous environments, leading to challenges in maintaining the interfacial stability between the PEM and the electrodes. Nonetheless, the higher water uptake by a PEM can enhance mass transfer and ion conduction through the PEMs and MEA interfaces, ,, especially in the case of sulfonated HC-based PEMs, which are incompatible with the commonly used PFSA-based ionomers in the electrodes. ,, Therefore, achieving an optimal balance between water absorption and areal expansion is crucial when PEMs are exposed to water.…”