2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-biomarker responses in fish ( Jenynsia multidentata ) to assess the impact of pollution in rivers with mixtures of environmental contaminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
25
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern of SOD and CAT in L.calcarifer showed a consistent and convincing outcome that these two biomarkers will respond the most in the liver, followed by gill and muscle. This agrees with studies reported by (Ameur et al, 2012;Beg et al, 2014;Ballesteros et al, 2017) in Mugil cephalus, Dicentrachus labrax, Acanthopagrus latus, Cynoglossus arel and Jenynsia multidentata. From these results it further explains, regardless differences a certain habitat have the response of SOD and CAT in L.calcarifer will respond following the capability of the organ to take up the pollutants as well as the route of xenobitics to get into the body system (Ahmad et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The pattern of SOD and CAT in L.calcarifer showed a consistent and convincing outcome that these two biomarkers will respond the most in the liver, followed by gill and muscle. This agrees with studies reported by (Ameur et al, 2012;Beg et al, 2014;Ballesteros et al, 2017) in Mugil cephalus, Dicentrachus labrax, Acanthopagrus latus, Cynoglossus arel and Jenynsia multidentata. From these results it further explains, regardless differences a certain habitat have the response of SOD and CAT in L.calcarifer will respond following the capability of the organ to take up the pollutants as well as the route of xenobitics to get into the body system (Ahmad et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…More particularly, histopathological indices (Maggioni et al, 2012) and fish somatic indices that relate the weight of determined tissues (i.e. liver, spleen, gonads) with the total fish weight are able to show pollutants effects on fish (i.e., Guyón et al, 2016;Ballesteros et al, 2017). On the other hand, fish biomarkers are useful tools in several steps of the risk assessment process: effect, exposure and hazard assessment, risk characterization or classification, and monitoring the environmental quality of aquatic ecosystems (van der Ooost et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the sustainable development goals, potential biological impacts of river pollution should be identified in order to implement effective national strategies for management and conservation of the water resources. Biomarker responses in fish are cost effective tools for monitoring and assessment of pollution impacts in riverine ecosystems (Ossana et al 2016;Ballesteros et al 2017). Even though the use of the biomarker responses in native fishes which are being exposed naturally to pollution loads in the riverine ecosystem over long periods is ideal for pollution impact assessments, it may not be practically feasible in some situations where same species could not be captured from all the study sites including the pristine sites for comparison of biomarker responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aquatic ecosystems, use of multi-biomarkers in fish at different levels of biological organization (molecular/biochemical, cellular, tissue/organ levels etc.) may give a more reliable picture of the pollution impacts (Ballesteros et al 2017;Vieira et al 2017). Inhibition of acetyl cholinesterase enzyme activities in fish can affect proper neurotransmission at cholinergic synapses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%