2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.662233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Atlas MRI-Based Striatum Segmentation for 123I-FP-CIT SPECT (DAT-SPECT) Compared With the Bolt Method and SPECT-Atlas-Based Segmentation Method Toward the Accurate Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease/Syndrome

Abstract: Aims: This study aimed to analyze the performance of multi-atlas MRI-based parcellation for 123I-FP-CIT SPECT (DAT-SPECT) in healthy volunteers. The proposed method was compared with the SPECT-atlas-based and Bolt methods. 18F-FE-PE2I-PET (DAT-PET) was used as a reference.Methods: Thirty healthy subjects underwent DAT-SPECT, DAT-PET, and 3D-T1WI-MRI. We calculated the striatum uptake ratio (SUR/SBR), caudate uptake ratio (CUR), and putamen uptake ratio (PUR) for DAT-SPECT using the multi-atlas MRI-based method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution volume ratio (DVR) was employed by neuroimaging studies as an index derived from mean uptake analysis of a region of interest (ROI) in the striatum, as a standard measure of DAT binding [ 17 ]. This index indicates the density of DAT in a ROI, and DVRs obtained from DAT-SPECT and PET correlates well across resolution differences [ 18 ]. However, this conventional analysis tends to excessively simplify the available spatial information [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution volume ratio (DVR) was employed by neuroimaging studies as an index derived from mean uptake analysis of a region of interest (ROI) in the striatum, as a standard measure of DAT binding [ 17 ]. This index indicates the density of DAT in a ROI, and DVRs obtained from DAT-SPECT and PET correlates well across resolution differences [ 18 ]. However, this conventional analysis tends to excessively simplify the available spatial information [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%