Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45023-8_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-agent System for Resource Allocation and Scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resource allocation in multi-agent systems is a well-studied area (e.g., (Chevaleyre et al 2006;Gorodetski, Karsaev, and Konushy 2003;Dolgov and Durfee 2006)). The general focus of this work is on topics such as how agents express their requirements, algorithms for allocating resources and evaluating the quality of the resulting allocations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource allocation in multi-agent systems is a well-studied area (e.g., (Chevaleyre et al 2006;Gorodetski, Karsaev, and Konushy 2003;Dolgov and Durfee 2006)). The general focus of this work is on topics such as how agents express their requirements, algorithms for allocating resources and evaluating the quality of the resulting allocations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the multi-agent literature, the use of market based allocation procedures is the main approach adopted to solve VRPTW. These procedures are often based on Contract Net Protocol (Davis and Smith, 1983;Fischer et al, 1999) or on Vickrey auction model (Vickrey, 1961;Gorodetski et al, 2003), but only few propose an approach for dynamic task reallocation. Fischer et al (Fischer et al, 1999) presented a multi-agent simulation framework where agents interactions are driven by negotiation protocols.…”
Section: Our Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This software tool was the subject of research during last years and the current version is the third one. Previous versions of MASDK [13] were used for rapid prototyping of different MAS applications [14,15]. The experience accumulated so far allowed understanding of the drawbacks and limitations of the previous two versions of MASDK and developing adequate requirements to its current version, 3.0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%