2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94548-0_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-agent Simulation for AI Behaviour Discovery in Operations Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of these new plan stems is evaluated, and any that meet the required minimum quality q are added to the open list (lines 11-15). If π was not expanded, then the plan has reached a leaf node, and if it meets the specified diversity requirement d, the complete plan is added to the final set of top plans P (lines [17][18][19]. Ties in plan quality are broken using diversity by continuing to evaluate plans until a lower-quality plan is found (lines 20-28).…”
Section: Plan Extraction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quality of these new plan stems is evaluated, and any that meet the required minimum quality q are added to the open list (lines 11-15). If π was not expanded, then the plan has reached a leaf node, and if it meets the specified diversity requirement d, the complete plan is added to the final set of top plans P (lines [17][18][19]. Ties in plan quality are broken using diversity by continuing to evaluate plans until a lower-quality plan is found (lines 20-28).…”
Section: Plan Extraction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planners that produce plan sets have applications in a wide range of fields, including planning for problems with incomplete or unknown user preferences [18], scenario prediction for risk management [27], plan recognition [28], plan repair [10], and explanation generation [5]. Our research is motivated by the discovery of novel agent behaviours in the context of operations research [16,19,23], recently proposed as an input to deceptive mission planning [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to their work, we focus primarily on combat within visual range using a range of planner-based behaviour recognition. We apply some of the techniques explored by Vered and Kaminka (2017) to a continuous flight behaviour recognition problem, successfully recognizing a range of behaviours simulated through the ACE0 multi-agent-based-simulation environment (Papasimeon and Benke, 2021) (described in further detail in Section 4).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this work, a light-weight version of ACE, known as ACE0 was employed. Further details on the architecture of ACE0 can be found in the paper by (Papasimeon and Benke, 2021). ACE0 is a minimal subset of ACE representing only two aircraft (or UAV) in 1v1 adversarial scenarios.…”
Section: Simulation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%