GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2020
DOI: 10.1109/globecom42002.2020.9322489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Agent Coordinated Interception of Multiple Rogue Drones

Abstract: Over the last few years there has been an unprecedented interest in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). However, drones potentially pose great threats to security and public safety, especially when their malicious use involves critical infrastructures and public spaces. This work proposes a multiagent counter-drone system where a team of pursuer drones cooperate in order to track and jam multiple rogue drones. Specifically, a cooperative multi-agent approach is proposed in which the best joint mobility and power … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of a rogue agent or manipulative agent exists in a number of research domains, including social networks [55,56], distributed systems [57,58], multi-agent systems [59,60,61], robotics [62,63], and many others. However, there are significant differences between a rogue agent in any of those fields and an MCF in terms of definition and functionality.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of a rogue agent or manipulative agent exists in a number of research domains, including social networks [55,56], distributed systems [57,58], multi-agent systems [59,60,61], robotics [62,63], and many others. However, there are significant differences between a rogue agent in any of those fields and an MCF in terms of definition and functionality.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the works in [29]- [32], investigate the problem of target jamming by multiple agents, and they propose centralized and distributed decision and control algorithms which can be used to tackle this problem. More specifically, in [29] the authors propose a centralized control approach where the jamming power level and mobility control actions of a team of pursuer agents are jointly decided in such way so that the jamming power received at the malicious drone is maximized, whereas in [30] a distributed control approach is proposed for the same problem. The works in [29], [30], however, tackle the problem in obstaclefree 2D environments with simplified discrete kinematic models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, in [29] the authors propose a centralized control approach where the jamming power level and mobility control actions of a team of pursuer agents are jointly decided in such way so that the jamming power received at the malicious drone is maximized, whereas in [30] a distributed control approach is proposed for the same problem. The works in [29], [30], however, tackle the problem in obstaclefree 2D environments with simplified discrete kinematic models. In addition, compared to the proposed approach, in which the problem is solved optimally over a rolling finite planning horizon, the approaches presented in [31], [32] are myopic greedy one-step ahead planners .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%