2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-27181-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-agent Cooperative Argumentation in Arg2P

Abstract: This work focuses on cooperative argumentation and conversation in multi-agent systems by introducing an extension of the Arg2P technology that enables parallelisation and distribution of the argumentation process. The computational model and the implementation underpinning the Arg2P technology are presented and discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the Dutch legislator only grants the right during the questioning (Argument A14), instead of the entire proceedings as stated by the European and usability of argumentation tools . Many improvements are indeed needed to make existing tools really user-friendly and effective (including when deployed in a distributed environment) [34], as well as documented and easily downloadable/deployable. In our future work on Arg2P, we intend to pay due attention to the latter aspects as well, so that our system may support effective applications of defeasible argumentation in legal domains [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Dutch legislator only grants the right during the questioning (Argument A14), instead of the entire proceedings as stated by the European and usability of argumentation tools . Many improvements are indeed needed to make existing tools really user-friendly and effective (including when deployed in a distributed environment) [34], as well as documented and easily downloadable/deployable. In our future work on Arg2P, we intend to pay due attention to the latter aspects as well, so that our system may support effective applications of defeasible argumentation in legal domains [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%