2021
DOI: 10.1364/boe.428223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mueller matrix polarimetry and polar decomposition of articular cartilage imaged in reflectance

Abstract: Articular cartilage birefringence relates to zonal architecture primarily of type II collagen, which has been assessed extensively in transmission, through thin tissue sections, to evaluate cartilage repair and degeneration. Mueller matrix imaging of articular cartilage in reflection is of potential utility for non-destructive imaging in clinical and research applications. Therefore, such an imaging system was constructed to measure laser reflectance signals, calibrated, and tested with optical standards. Pola… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar levels of the rms value (0.0018) have been found for air as a calibration sample for a Mueller matrix polarimeter that uses a similar PSA to that in the present experiment [42]. For a Mueller matrix polarimeter with a PSA made up of a rotating QWP or dual-rotating retarders and a linear polarizer, rms values on the order of 0.004-0.04 or even higher have been reported for air and phase wave-plates as samples [11,16,43,44]. For Mueller matrix polarimeters using photoelastic modulators or liquid-crystal variable retarders, the rms of the difference between the measured Mueller matrix and the expected ones in the range 0.006-0.028 has been found [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar levels of the rms value (0.0018) have been found for air as a calibration sample for a Mueller matrix polarimeter that uses a similar PSA to that in the present experiment [42]. For a Mueller matrix polarimeter with a PSA made up of a rotating QWP or dual-rotating retarders and a linear polarizer, rms values on the order of 0.004-0.04 or even higher have been reported for air and phase wave-plates as samples [11,16,43,44]. For Mueller matrix polarimeters using photoelastic modulators or liquid-crystal variable retarders, the rms of the difference between the measured Mueller matrix and the expected ones in the range 0.006-0.028 has been found [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Sample polarimetry is a non-invasive technique to determine the linear optical behavior of an unknown sample [1][2][3]. This behavior is related to the sample composition, structure, thickness, surface roughness, etc, and its knowledge is very useful in many different areas, such as medical diagnostic techniques [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], technological materials characterization and fabrication control [2,[12][13][14][15][16][17], identification and counting of microplastics in wastewater [18] or air pollution detection [19][20][21]. Many different Mueller matrix polarimetric techniques have been developed up to now (see, for example, [1,2,10,[22][23][24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, the polarization properties of complex media determined by the reciprocal polar decomposition of the backscattering Mueller matrices are in excellent agreement with those obtained by polarization imaging of the same sample in the forward geometry. Furthermore, when light depolarization (∆) is elevated, the accuracy of recovered media polarization parameters deteriorates from polarization imaging [22]. The performance of reciprocal polar decomposition for complex media of high depolarization warrants further study and will be published later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polarized spectral imaging is a technique capable of distinguishing deeply scattered photons and superficially scattered photons at multiple wavelengths. [9][10][11][12][13][14] The population of photons scattered by only one or a few scattering events from superficial tissue layers, the subdiffuse scatter, partially retains the orientation of the incident polarized light. The population of multiply scattered photons backscattered from the deeper tissue is depolarized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%