1995
DOI: 10.1117/12.206161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mueller matrix imaging polarimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the 3×3 submatrix m′ , the depolarization Mueller matrices M Δ (g) were obtained through Eqs. (7) and (10). Figure 2(a) shows the experimental values for the depolarization power, Δ(g), calculated in accordance with Eq.…”
Section: Depolarization Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the 3×3 submatrix m′ , the depolarization Mueller matrices M Δ (g) were obtained through Eqs. (7) and (10). Figure 2(a) shows the experimental values for the depolarization power, Δ(g), calculated in accordance with Eq.…”
Section: Depolarization Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Then, the state of polarization (SoP) is not described by the complex amplitudes of the electric field but by the corresponding Stokes vector. Experimental Mueller matrices of a LCoS cell have been measured with several polarimetric techniques [10,11]. Between them, it should be mentioned those based on nematic liquid crystal variable retarders [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the calculation, the LC droplet can be considered as a composite of thin slices, which is a single birefringent element (Kitzerow, 1994). Because the retarders are generated from the single birefringent plate, the polarization properties show moderately linear correlation with the retardance of wavelength (Pezzaniti and Chipman, 1995;Chipman and Bass, 1995); therefore the degree of polarization can be evaluated as a function of wavelength retardance, which is shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Images Obtained Using Mmp And A Cryo-semmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a uniform input 45° linear polarization exits the system with some nonuniformity and finite ellipticity caused by a relative phase shift between S and P polarization of 2.5 to 3.2 degrees, but the pupil-averaged output angle is only rotated by 0.1° to 0.2°. The next step in the design validation is to measure Mueller matrices of various first mirror surface materials as a function of wavelength and angle of incidence, and use these in a more complete polarization ray trace in Code V. These measurements will be made by a Mueller matrix angle of incidence imaging polarimeter [9]. Two example mirror candidates have already been checked using this technique for a limited number of angles.…”
Section: Iter Mse Design Work and Mirror Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%