Proceedings of the 24th International Spin Symposium (SPIN2021) 2022
DOI: 10.7566/jpscp.37.020604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

muEDM: Towards a Search for the Muon Electric Dipole Moment at PSI Using the Frozen-spin Technique

Abstract: The search for a permanent electric dipole moment (EDM) of the muon is an excellent probe for physics beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. We propose the first dedicated muon EDM search employing the frozen-spin technique at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Switzerland, with a sensitivity of 6 × 10 −23 e • cm, improving the current best limit set by the E821 experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory by more than three orders of magnitude. In preparation for a high precision experiment to measure… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the Future Circular Collider (FCC) may be able to measure κ µ with relative precision of ∼ 0.4% whose contours are shown as dot-dashed magenta lines in figure 3. 8 In the whole parameter region shown in the figure, the muon EDM is predicted to be larger than the future sensitivity of the PSI muEDM experiment, 6 × 10 −23 e cm [10][11][12]. The 2σ discrepancy of (g − 2) µ can be explained for 560 GeV < m ψ 1 < 780 GeV, while only the region of m ψ 1 m ϕ + 1 is favored for the correct DM relic density.…”
Section: Jhep02(2023)234mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the Future Circular Collider (FCC) may be able to measure κ µ with relative precision of ∼ 0.4% whose contours are shown as dot-dashed magenta lines in figure 3. 8 In the whole parameter region shown in the figure, the muon EDM is predicted to be larger than the future sensitivity of the PSI muEDM experiment, 6 × 10 −23 e cm [10][11][12]. The 2σ discrepancy of (g − 2) µ can be explained for 560 GeV < m ψ 1 < 780 GeV, while only the region of m ψ 1 m ϕ + 1 is favored for the correct DM relic density.…”
Section: Jhep02(2023)234mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Table 1. Mass scales of new physics that produce the muon EDM at the one/two-loop level probed by the projected PSI muEDM experiment [10][11][12] (the Fermilab Muon g − 2 and J-PARC Muon g − 2/EDM experiments [8,9]) for each approach presented in the main text. Here, we assume λ ≈ 0.65 of around the weak coupling constant and y µτ ≈ 0.3 which is roughly the maximum value allowed by the measurement of the branching ratio of h → µτ (see, e.g., ref.…”
Section: Jhep02(2023)234mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, the current limit on the µEDM set by the muon (g − 2) experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory and the projected ones by J-PARC and PSI muEDM are [68][69][70] |d BNL µ /e| < 1.9 • 10 −19 cm ≈ 9.6 • 10 −6 GeV −1 (2.9a)…”
Section: Jcap02(2024)052 2 Baryogenesis At the Electroweak Scalementioning
confidence: 96%