Mudskipper pectoral fin kinematics in aquatic and terrestrial environments

Abstract

SUMMARYMudskippers use pectoral fins for their primary mode of locomotion on land and pectoral fins in conjunction with the axial musculature and caudal fin to move in water. We hypothesized that distinct pectoral fin movements enable effective locomotion in each environment. Additionally, we made three functional predictions about fin movements during locomotion on land versus water: the pectoral fin is depressed more on land than in water; the pectoral fin will have greater changes in fin area between propulsive and recovery phases in water versus land; anterior and posterior excursions will be greater on land than in water. Locomotion was recorded in each environment using a high-speed digital-imaging system and kinematic variables were calculated from digitized landmark points. Variables were analyzed using principal components analysis and matched pairs ttests. Mudskippers produce distinct kinematic patterns across environments (P<0.003), although only some of our predictions were supported. The magnitude of fin depression is the same across habitats. However, depression occurs during the propulsive phase on land (by -0.60 cm), whereas during the propulsive phase in water the fin is elevated (by +0.13 cm). We were unable to support the hypothesis that fin orientation differs between environments. Lastly, anterior extension of the fin is greater on land (1.8 cm, versus 1.3 cm in water), creating a larger stride length in this environment. We posit that the mudskipper pectoral fin may facilitate stability in water and thrust production on land, and suggest that the robust fin morphology of the goby lineage may predispose species within this group to terrestrial locomotion.

Getting around when you’re round: quantitative analysis of the locomotion of the blunt-spined brittle star,Ophiocoma echinata

“…In contrast, alternating limb movements without careful coordination would often result in 'wasted' motion because of rotation of the body or movement perpendicular to the direction of overall motion, and limbs may overlap or otherwise interact in detrimental ways during the stride cycle. Locomotion similar to brittle star rowing is seen in the terrestrial locomotion of sea turtles (Renous and Bels, 1993) and mudskippers (Pace and Gibb, 2009), suggesting that this form of locomotion is advantageous even for organisms with bilateral symmetry and sophisticated nervous and muscular systems.…”

Locomotor behavior across an environmental transition in the ropefish,Erpetoichthys calabaricus

“…Periophthalmus) and some salamanders (e.g. Taricha) primarily use their tail for aquatic locomotion, but rely more on their paired appendages during terrestrial locomotion (Frolich and Biewener, 1992;Ashley-Ross and Bechtel, 2004;Pace and Gibb, 2009). However, elongate limbless vertebrates (or vertebrates with non-weight-bearing appendages) must employ the same propulsive structure, the axial skeleton and musculature, across both habitats.…”

Forelimb kinematics and motor patterns of the slider turtle (Trachemys scripta) during swimming and walking: shared and novel strategies for meeting locomotor demands of water and land

“…The physical characteristics of locomotor environments strongly influence the functional demands that the musculoskeletal systems of animals must satisfy (Gillis, 1998a;Gillis and Biewener, 2000;Gillis and Blob, 2001;Higham and Jayne, 2004;Blob et al, 2008;Pace and Gibb, 2009). Species that live in a restricted range of habitats may show specializations that facilitate locomotor performance under specific physical conditions, whereas species that live in or traverse multiple habitats must use a single set of locomotor structures to meet potentially disparate functional requirements (Gillis and Biewener, 2002;Daley and Biewener, 2003;Biewener and Daley, 2007).…”