“…The fine-grained nature of mudstones and shales, with >50% of their particles <62.5 μm in diameter, has made them difficult to characterize mineralogically and texturally (Milliken and Hayman, 2020) . In spite of this difficulty, however, a great deal has been learned over the past few decades about their mineralogy, organic matter, and textures at spatial scales ranging from nanometers to millimeters. ,− The analytical and structural methods used for these studies include powder X-ray diffraction and Rietveld analysis, , synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and micro-X-ray fluorescence imaging of element distributions (μ-XRF), , electron microprobe analysis and backscattered electron imaging, , X-ray computed tomography (X-CT), , small-angle X-ray and small-angle neutron scattering, ,− attenuated total reflectance (ATR) FTIR spectroscopy, 13 C NMR, − SIMS, and electron microscopy methods, , including modern ion milling techniques to produce very thin samples with flat surfaces and little mechanical damage. , Characterization studies of shales and mudstones using these and other methods have shown that they are not homogeneous and that their permeabilities vary by 13–15 orders of magnitude …”