2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-873x.00235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mudflat: The Aesthetics of a Marine Biologist’s Engagement with Her Work

Abstract: This article offers two edited/shaped pieces of conversation between a retired marine biologist and her daughter. The first conversation takes place on a Florida mudflat, the second in a North Carolina kitchen. These conversations suggest the biologist's "intimacy with the environment of the mudflat," a lifetime of discovery and surprise in relation to that environment, and the role of aesthetic response in her motivation for scientific work. They affirm Eisner and Powell's (2002) assertion in "Art in Science?… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nalini Nadkarni studies forest canopy biota and establishes connections with nonscientific audiences and artists for the purposes of heightening awareness of canopy ecology (Nadkarni 2004(Nadkarni , 2007(Nadkarni , 2008. Other scientists manage to merge an interest in aesthetics and science (e.g., Sullivan and McCrary 2002). Some UK and Australian scientific organizations have hosted artists in residence who have created works that were inspired by, or were a response to, science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nalini Nadkarni studies forest canopy biota and establishes connections with nonscientific audiences and artists for the purposes of heightening awareness of canopy ecology (Nadkarni 2004(Nadkarni , 2007(Nadkarni , 2008. Other scientists manage to merge an interest in aesthetics and science (e.g., Sullivan and McCrary 2002). Some UK and Australian scientific organizations have hosted artists in residence who have created works that were inspired by, or were a response to, science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scientists merge an interest in aesthetics and science (e.g. Sullivan and McCrary, 2002;Pope, 2005), and some UK and Australian scientific organizations have had artist-in-residencies where artists have created artworks that were inspired by, or were a response to, the science. Williams (2001: 3) gave two examples of art being used to bring science to a wider public: an exhibition by the artist John Wolseley who brought to life the Wallace Line and 'exposed a broad audience to a discovery that has changed the way we view the world', and the work of Annie Franklin who did a painting that captured the philosophy underlying the Native Vegetation Research and Development Program of Land and Water Australia.…”
Section: Background: Historical Relations Between Arts and Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%