Mud, muddle and models in the knowledge value-chain to action on tropical peatland conservation

Abstract

Tropical peatlands are known not only for their high, area-based, carbon emissions in response to land-use change but also as hot spots of debate about associated data uncertainties. Perspectives are still evolving on factors underlying the variability and uncertainty. Debate includes the ways of reducing emissions through rewetting, reforestation and agroforestry. A knowledge value-chain that is long and complex links (a) fundamental understanding of peat and peatland processes leading to sciencebased quantification and default values, (b) willingness and (c) ability to act towards emission reduction, and ultimately (d) to local, national and global actions that effectively provide rules, incentives and motivation to conserve peat and reduce emissions. We discuss this value chain, its stakeholders and issues that still remain partially unresolved. We conclude that, to shorten the denial and conspiracy-theory stages of debate that otherwise slow down steps B and C, networks of international and national scientists have to be involved at the early stage of identifying policysensitive environmental issues. Models span part of the knowledge value-chain but transition of analysis units requires specific attention, from soil volumes through area and commodity flows to Strateg Glob Change (2014) 19:887-905 opportunities for reductions. While drainage of peatlands triggers landscape-scale increases in emissions, factors beyond drainage depth, including nutrient supply, may have a major influence on decomposition rates. Attempts to disentangle the contributions of plant and peat-based respiration in surface flux measurements involve assumptions that cannot be easily verified in comparisons between land uses. With progress on A leading to new internationally accepted defaults and with resistance on step B reduced, the reality of C and lack of working solutions for D is currently constraining further progress.

Keep wetlands wet: the myth of sustainable development of tropical peatlands – implications for policies and management

“…Driven by the large emissions factors cited from burning events, increasing regional pressure due to transboundary haze (Mahmud, ), Indonesia's status as the 3rd largest emitter of GHGs globally (van Noordwijk et al ., ) and, more recently, local government and university scientists’ verification of international emissions factors for peat soil in plantations (van Noordwijk et al ., ), Indonesian public policy has increasingly recognized the ecological importance of peatlands, reflected in a range of policies for conservation and best management practices. Among the earliest was Presidential Decree No.…”

Carbon neutral? No change in mineral soil carbon stock under oil palm plantations derived from forest or non-forest in Indonesia

“…Current use of peat soils causes CO 2 emissions that far exceed the amount sequestered in harvested products (Hooijer et al, 2010;Couwenberg et al, 2010;Hergoualc'h and Verchot, 2011). Carbon debts due to conversion can continue to increase on peat soils at a rate exceeding the reductions of fossil energy release that palm oil products can substitute for, causing (near) infinite 'pay-back' times (van Noordwijk et al, 2014b). On mineral soils, an initial carbon debt to the atmosphere can be recovered by subsequent biomass development and harvestable yields if these offset fossil fuel use.…”

A Deep-Time Socioecosystem Framework to Understand Social Vulnerability on a Tropical Island

“…During the Ceramic Age in generalbut mainly reflecting the patterns of the Ostionoid period given that little information is available on the Saladoid period -site distribution suggests the presence of two central sites, one on the coast and one inland at the top of the karst range, both immediately next to the river. These two large sites which feature multiple ball courts and mounds, were locations where smaller, dispersed communities and households could gather, as proposed by Torres (2008) for the Southern landscape around Tibes.…”

“…The global environmental crises faced today have inspired different communities of action to invest in conservation efforts to restore and improve the environmental characteristics of ecosystems, particularly in ecologically sensitive areas such as tropical islands (Lowenthal 2013;van Noordwijk et al 2014;Epting 2015;Peters, Hamilton, and Eames 2015). However, many of these efforts seldom consider the deep-time socio-natural legacies of the areas targeted for restauration and conservation.…”