Mucosal Priming of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Responses in Rhesus Macaques by theSalmonellaType III Secretion Antigen Delivery System
Abstract:Nearly all human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections are acquired mucosally, and the gut-associated lymphoid tissues are important sites for early virus replication. Thus, vaccine strategies designed to prime virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses that home to mucosal compartments may be particularly effective at preventing or containing HIV infection. The Salmonella type III secretion system has been shown to be an effective approach for stimulating mucosal CTL responses in mice. We therefo… Show more
“…Our results show clearly that priming with Ad5hr-SIVenv/rev and boosting with gp120 was not sufficient to protect against SIV mac251 rectal challenge but that additional priming with either Ad5hr-SIVgag and/or Ad5hr-SIV nef⌬ [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] resulted in significant and similar extents of viremia control. Protective effects seen in group II, III, and IV macaques were not restricted to viremia reduction, but extended to survival times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined in Table 1, five groups of seven to eight macaques each were primed at week 0 intranasally and orally and at week 12 intratracheally with Ad5hr-SIV smH4 env/rev alone, with the Ad5hr-SIVenv/rev recombinant plus Ad5hr-SIV mac239 gag or Ad5hr-SIV mac239 nef⌬ [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] , or with all three recombinants (5 ϫ 10 8 PFU/recombinant). A sixth control group was given empty E3-deleted Ad5hr vector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike HIV transmission, where CCR5-using strains predominate, SHIV 89.6P uses CXCR4 and is highly sensitive to neutralization with autologous antibodies. With the exception of live attenuated SIV vaccines able to confer complete protection (7) but with associated safety concerns (38), current strategies have not provided equivalent protection against more vigorous SIV strains with greater relevance to HIV infection, including uncloned SIV mac251 (4,19,28,30), cloned SIV mac239 (10,15), SIVsmE660 (8,9,29) and SIVsmDeltaB670 (12). Strong protection against SIV mac251 intrarectal challenge was reported in one study (2), but similar protective efficacy was not achieved subsequently (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong persistent control of viral replication was not achieved, however. We modified the immunization regimen and added Ad5hr-SIV nef⌬ [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] to the vaccine strategy. Priming with these Ad5hr-SIV recombinants elicited potent cellular immunity to all four encoded SIV genes: env, rev, gag, and nef.…”
Whereas several recent AIDS vaccine strategies have protected rhesus macaques against a pathogenic simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 89.6P challenge, similar approaches have provided only modest, transient reductions in viral burden after challenge with virulent, pathogenic SIV, which is more representative of HIV infection of people. We show here that priming with replicating adenovirus recombinants encoding SIV env/rev, gag, and/or nef genes, followed by boosting with SIV gp120 or an SIV polypeptide mimicking the CD4 binding region of the envelope, protects rhesus macaques from intrarectal infection with the highly pathogenic SIV mac251 . Using trend analysis, significant reductions in acute-phase and set point viremia were correlated with anti-gp120 antibody and cellular immune responses, respectively. Within immunization groups exhibiting significant protection, a subset (39%) of macaques have exhibited either no viremia, cleared viremia, or controlled viremia at the threshold of detection, now more than 40 weeks postchallenge. This combination prime-boost strategy, utilizing replication competent adenovirus, is a promising alternative for HIV vaccine development.
“…Our results show clearly that priming with Ad5hr-SIVenv/rev and boosting with gp120 was not sufficient to protect against SIV mac251 rectal challenge but that additional priming with either Ad5hr-SIVgag and/or Ad5hr-SIV nef⌬ [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] resulted in significant and similar extents of viremia control. Protective effects seen in group II, III, and IV macaques were not restricted to viremia reduction, but extended to survival times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined in Table 1, five groups of seven to eight macaques each were primed at week 0 intranasally and orally and at week 12 intratracheally with Ad5hr-SIV smH4 env/rev alone, with the Ad5hr-SIVenv/rev recombinant plus Ad5hr-SIV mac239 gag or Ad5hr-SIV mac239 nef⌬ [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] , or with all three recombinants (5 ϫ 10 8 PFU/recombinant). A sixth control group was given empty E3-deleted Ad5hr vector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike HIV transmission, where CCR5-using strains predominate, SHIV 89.6P uses CXCR4 and is highly sensitive to neutralization with autologous antibodies. With the exception of live attenuated SIV vaccines able to confer complete protection (7) but with associated safety concerns (38), current strategies have not provided equivalent protection against more vigorous SIV strains with greater relevance to HIV infection, including uncloned SIV mac251 (4,19,28,30), cloned SIV mac239 (10,15), SIVsmE660 (8,9,29) and SIVsmDeltaB670 (12). Strong protection against SIV mac251 intrarectal challenge was reported in one study (2), but similar protective efficacy was not achieved subsequently (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong persistent control of viral replication was not achieved, however. We modified the immunization regimen and added Ad5hr-SIV nef⌬ [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] to the vaccine strategy. Priming with these Ad5hr-SIV recombinants elicited potent cellular immunity to all four encoded SIV genes: env, rev, gag, and nef.…”
Whereas several recent AIDS vaccine strategies have protected rhesus macaques against a pathogenic simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 89.6P challenge, similar approaches have provided only modest, transient reductions in viral burden after challenge with virulent, pathogenic SIV, which is more representative of HIV infection of people. We show here that priming with replicating adenovirus recombinants encoding SIV env/rev, gag, and/or nef genes, followed by boosting with SIV gp120 or an SIV polypeptide mimicking the CD4 binding region of the envelope, protects rhesus macaques from intrarectal infection with the highly pathogenic SIV mac251 . Using trend analysis, significant reductions in acute-phase and set point viremia were correlated with anti-gp120 antibody and cellular immune responses, respectively. Within immunization groups exhibiting significant protection, a subset (39%) of macaques have exhibited either no viremia, cleared viremia, or controlled viremia at the threshold of detection, now more than 40 weeks postchallenge. This combination prime-boost strategy, utilizing replication competent adenovirus, is a promising alternative for HIV vaccine development.
“…Therefore, this strategy is an effective way to deliver antigens directly inside APCs. [5][6][7][8][9] earliest non-surgical cancer treatment. In the nineteenth century, William Coley developed the first bacterial-based cancer treatment, which was composed of killed gram-positive streptococci and gram-negative Serratia marcescens injected directly into the tumor.…”
Section: How To Deliver An Antigen Inside Apcs By Means Of a Bacteriumentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.