2021
DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucosal immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection

Abstract: Purpose of review Despite its crucial role in protection against viral infections, mucosal immunity has been largely understudied in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This review outlines the current evidence about the role of mucosal immune responses in the clearance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, as well as potential mucosal mechanisms of protection against (re-)infection. Recent findings T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SARS-CoV-2 is typically transmitted nasally or orally and infects cells in the mucosae of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts [5][6][7][8]. Although serum NAbs are a correlate of protection against COVID-19 [9,10], mucosal antibodies might directly prevent or limit virus acquisition by the nasal, oral, and conjunctival routes [5][6][7][8]11]. Indeed, antibodies in the respiratory tract or oral cavity have been deemed important to protection against a human-to-human transmitted hantavirus, influenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SARS-CoV-2 is typically transmitted nasally or orally and infects cells in the mucosae of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts [5][6][7][8]. Although serum NAbs are a correlate of protection against COVID-19 [9,10], mucosal antibodies might directly prevent or limit virus acquisition by the nasal, oral, and conjunctival routes [5][6][7][8]11]. Indeed, antibodies in the respiratory tract or oral cavity have been deemed important to protection against a human-to-human transmitted hantavirus, influenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, NAb assays only assess limited aspects of clinical immunity in that the interaction between test sera, viruses, and cultured cells susceptible to viral infection are included. There are several details that are not analyzed, such as cellular immunity overall, tissue-based cellular immunity [ 20 ], tissue-based humoral immunity with mucosal IgA not correlating well with circulating IgA [ 21 ] and of course immune memory [ 1 , 22 ], which seems to be persisting as of now; however, using antibody tests as surrogates even if not fully validated seems more practical. Assessing long-term clinical immunity required probably 10,000s of unvaccinated convalescents followed prospectively over many years which seems hardly doable at least for the time being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sufficiently high concentrations of NAb in the NELF can block the attachment of virus to the host cell receptor. The SIgA is known to trap virus efficiently and facilitates the removal of such by the mucociliary beating (25), to neutralize virus particles with epithelial cell and lamina propria (17), and has anti-inflammatory properties (26).…”
Section: % Nab Detection In Coronavac Subjects' Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%