2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00161-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucosal co-administration of cholera toxin and influenza virus hemagglutinin-DNA in ponies generates a local IgA response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations that may arise after mucosal DNA vaccination may be overcome, potentiating its effectiveness by adsorption of DNA into positively charged polylactide-coglycolide microparticles (19), or codelivering the DNA that encodes for the specific Ag with DNA vectors encoding cytokines (20). Also, coadministration of DNA vectors with mucosal adjuvants have been proved to be as an efficient strategy, giving protection against equine influenza in a pony model (21).…”
Section: Induction Of Hiv Immunity In the Genitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations that may arise after mucosal DNA vaccination may be overcome, potentiating its effectiveness by adsorption of DNA into positively charged polylactide-coglycolide microparticles (19), or codelivering the DNA that encodes for the specific Ag with DNA vectors encoding cytokines (20). Also, coadministration of DNA vectors with mucosal adjuvants have been proved to be as an efficient strategy, giving protection against equine influenza in a pony model (21).…”
Section: Induction Of Hiv Immunity In the Genitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, protective immunity to equine influenza is likely to involve a mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) response which is not seen with traditional intramuscularly administered vaccines (19). Equine influenza virus replicates in the nasal mucosa, and thus an intranasally administered vaccine may be a preferable route of inoculation to elicit this response (31). Finally, live vaccines also have the advantage of intranasal administration, which avoids the swelling and muscle soreness occasionally associated with the intramuscular administration of inactivated adjuvanted vaccines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has focused on exploring alternative vaccine technologies that can confer broad, long-lived protection against infection (44), with more efficient production methods (64). Recent studies have utilized modified live viruses (MLV)(8,9, 35, 57), pox virus vectors (5, 45, 54), DNA technology (35), and adjuvants (21, 55) to develop improved vaccines, some of which are now in commercial use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%