2017
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucosal Barrier Injury Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections: What is the Impact of Standard Prevention Bundles?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After a period of unit education, post-test assessments noted that 89% of RNs felt confident in assessment and management of patients with MBI (Appendix Figs A2A and A2B, online only). 10,11 Nurses were also trained on WHO grading of mucositis and appropriate documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). The incidence of MBI during the first PDSA remained stable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After a period of unit education, post-test assessments noted that 89% of RNs felt confident in assessment and management of patients with MBI (Appendix Figs A2A and A2B, online only). 10,11 Nurses were also trained on WHO grading of mucositis and appropriate documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). The incidence of MBI during the first PDSA remained stable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventions to reduce MBI-LCBI are not standardized, and literature supporting interventions to mitigate these events is limited. Vaughan et al 11 retrospectively examined their CLABSI events to determine whether standard bundle protocols for central line care would reduce MBI-LCBI events and found a reduction in both MBI-and non-MBI-related events. Furthermore, Kemp et al 12 recently published their attempts to reduce CLABSI events through oral care and hygiene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Implementation of these strategies reduce the incidence of CLABSI among hospitalized patients, though to a lesser degree in pediatric patients with leukemia. [3][4][5] Many episodes of bacteremia in oncology patients occur with chemotherapy-associated neutropenia, mucositis, and translocation of organisms from oral or gastrointestinal mucosa, thus additional prevention measures have been investigated. [2][3][4][5][6] Studies of adult oncology patients have demonstrated that the use of prophylactic antibiotics during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is effective in reducing infections, including bacteremia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Many episodes of bacteremia in oncology patients occur with chemotherapy-associated neutropenia, mucositis, and translocation of organisms from oral or gastrointestinal mucosa, thus additional prevention measures have been investigated. [2][3][4][5][6] Studies of adult oncology patients have demonstrated that the use of prophylactic antibiotics during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is effective in reducing infections, including bacteremia. [7][8][9] Until recently, similar studies in pediatrics were limited to single-center or nonrandomized trials that yielded conflicting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudos publicados, com populações oncológicas, sobre o impacto do uso do critério de ICS-LBM Lesão de Barreira MucosaApesar da evidente importância da utilização do critério de ICS-LBM para as definições de medidas preventivas mais específicas, é importante considerar que esta definição utiliza critérios epidemiológicos. Uma parcela destes casos pode, na verdade, tratar-se de infecção cuja fonte seja o CVC 72,68. Para avaliar esta possibilidade, Kamboj et al, em 2014, descreveram em seu estudo a possibilidade das ICS-LBM terem o foco da infecção no cateter.…”
unclassified