1979
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-197901000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the air passages: Report of three cases

Abstract: A review of the literature on tumors of the small salivary and mucous glands reveals that mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the upper respiratory system is a very rare occurrence. Three such cases are reported in detail, representing 3% of all tumors of small salivary and mucous gland origin recorded by the authors over a period of 20 years. This incidence is high. Follow-up was from 3 to 12 1/2 years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SN‐MEC and SG‐MEC share several clinical features. Consistent with prior studies, there does not seem to be a gender predilection in SN‐MEC and SG‐MEC. Both SN‐MEC and SG‐MEC predominantly affect the white population, with the black population being the second most commonly affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…SN‐MEC and SG‐MEC share several clinical features. Consistent with prior studies, there does not seem to be a gender predilection in SN‐MEC and SG‐MEC. Both SN‐MEC and SG‐MEC predominantly affect the white population, with the black population being the second most commonly affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A review of publications in English (MEDLINE, 1966-2011) was performed, with all cases reported as MEC of the sinonasal tract included in the review [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. However, many cases were excluded if the lesion arose primarily in the oral cavity or parotid gland and extended into the sinonasal tract, or represented a different tumor type (hamartoma, squamous cell carcinoma, primary sinonasal tract adenocarcinoma), or if the information was too generalized and non-specific to make a meaningful interpretation of the demographics, histologic features, or patient outcome [8,9,11,13,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The varied clinical behavior, treatment alternatives, and long-term patient prognosis of the different grades of MEC play a role in diagnosis and management for major salivary gland sites. While there have been a few series, the information is often included with general discussions about carcinoma of the sinonasal tract, about MEC in the head and neck [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], or is limited to case reports in the English literature (Table 2) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Therefore, there is no large comprehensive evaluation of primary sinonasal tract MECs with respect to their histomorphology, immunohistochemical reactivity, clinical behavior, and treatment outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Die Stellung der histologischén Diagnose ist schwierig. Die Fehldeutung als Plattenepithelkarzinoni wurde auch von anderen Autoren berichtet (11,29,60,62). Wie alle Speicheldrusentumoren sind auch die MEK durch eine groBe histologische Vielfalt charakterisiert.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified