2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2008.01045.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucocutaneous Splendore‐Hoeppli phenomenon

Abstract: Splendore-Hoeppli phenomenon (asteroid bodies) is the in vivo formation of intensely eosinophilic material (radiate, star-like, asteroid or club-shaped configurations) around microorganisms (fungi, bacteria and parasites) or biologically inert substances. This study presents a literature review concerning Splendore-Hoeppli reaction in the mucocutaneous diseases. It examines the histopathological features, nature and differential diagnosis of this reaction. It also discusses the mucocutaneous infections and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
125
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The histopathological changes observed in the skin biopsy from the affected bull, were similar to the described in previous reports. Lesions of actinobacillosis have a very distinctive pattern, reported as Actinobacillus granulomas, which consist of neutrophils and club-like rosettes with a central mass of Gram negative bacilli (Splendore hoepli) surrounded by neutrophils, mononuclear cells and fibrosis (Anderson et al 1990, Aslani et al 1995, Rycroft & Garside 2000, Milne et al 2001, Radostits et al 2007, Hussein 2008, Angelo et al 2009, Taghipour Bazargani et al 2010.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histopathological changes observed in the skin biopsy from the affected bull, were similar to the described in previous reports. Lesions of actinobacillosis have a very distinctive pattern, reported as Actinobacillus granulomas, which consist of neutrophils and club-like rosettes with a central mass of Gram negative bacilli (Splendore hoepli) surrounded by neutrophils, mononuclear cells and fibrosis (Anderson et al 1990, Aslani et al 1995, Rycroft & Garside 2000, Milne et al 2001, Radostits et al 2007, Hussein 2008, Angelo et al 2009, Taghipour Bazargani et al 2010.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar eosinophilic granulomas have been caused by C. ulcerans T. Oyama et al (Murakami et al 2014) and M. granulomatis (Riet-Correa et al 1992), and further studies would find other organisms associated with bovine eosinophilic granuloma. Splendore-Hoeppli material is said to consist of tissue debris, fibrin, and immunoglobulin (Hussein 2008, Johnson et al 2010. In two cases of human conjunctival lesions exhibiting the Splendore-Hoeppli phenomenon, one revealed predominantly immunoglobulin deposition, whereas the other revealed primarily eosinophilic major basic protein (Read et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Splendore-Hoeppli phenomenon is seen by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining as club-shaped or band-like eosinophilic structures surrounding microorganisms or foreign bodies (Hussein 2008, Schnadig 2010. Bacterial colonies with surrounding Splendore-Hoeppli material are designated sulfur granules, which may be observed in infections of Actinomyces, Trueperella pyogenes, Actinobacillus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cattle (Kubo et al 1980(Kubo et al , 1981(Kubo et al , 1982.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors observed the Splendore-Hoeppli reaction on histopathologic tissue sections from sporotrichosis patients. This reaction indicates a localised immunologic response to antigens of several infectious organisms, such as fungi, bacteria and parasites (Hussein, 2008), and appears as a radiating homogenous, refractile, eosinophilic, club-like material surrounding a central eosinophilic focus (Larone, 2002). Splendore first observed this structure in 1908 on tissue sections from patients with sporotrichosis and afterwards by Hoeppli in 1932 around schistosome larvae (Kwon-Chung & Bennett, 1992).…”
Section: Conventional Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%