2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2005.01530.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucocele of the appendix with magnetic resonance imaging findings

Abstract: Mucocele of the appendix is a rare lesion caused by abnormal accumulation of mucus. Although preoperative diagnosis is important to avoid rupture of a mucocele, the diagnosis is often made at surgery. We report a case of an appendiceal mucocele that mimicked a hydrosalpinx on CT and MRI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visualization of the appendix revealing the diameter of the appendix exceeding 15 mm are considered to be a specific appendiceal mucocele index [20,21]. In CT, a well-capsulated cystic formation with calcificates in the wall is visualized [22,23]. Another indicator is the presence of appendiceal lumen exceeding 13 mm [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualization of the appendix revealing the diameter of the appendix exceeding 15 mm are considered to be a specific appendiceal mucocele index [20,21]. In CT, a well-capsulated cystic formation with calcificates in the wall is visualized [22,23]. Another indicator is the presence of appendiceal lumen exceeding 13 mm [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On computed tomography the changes are well circumscribed with Hounsfield values close to that of water. On MRI the lesions are hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences and hypo- or isointense on T1-weighted sequences [15,16]. Some characteristics of imaging findings in AM with torsion have been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Thus, if the reporting radiologist does not consider the possibility of an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm as a mimic for gynecological disease, the abnormality may be undermanaged, leading to long-term surveillance or no routine imaging follow-up at all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%