2015
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00808-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucin Binding Reduces Colistin Antimicrobial Activity

Abstract: Colistin has found increasing use in treating drug-resistant bacterial lung infections, but potential interactions with pulmonary biomolecules have not been investigated. We postulated that colistin, like aminoglycoside antibiotics, may bind to secretory mucin in sputum or epithelial mucin that lines airways, reducing free drug levels. To test this hypothesis, we measured binding of colistin and other antibiotics to porcine mucin, a family of densely glycosylated proteins used as a surrogate for human sputum a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
83
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
83
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Colistin acts through positively charged electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), facilitating membrane disruption. The observed lowering of the efficacy of colistin in AS medium, therefore, may not only be related to an altered growth rate in this environment (which mimics growth conditions in the CF lung), but also may be due to LPS modification and/or direct binding by mucin in the AS medium, effectively sequestering free antibiotic (41). This EPS effect, and the apparent differences in MICs for colistin-treated NH57388A (with MIC values 4 times greater in AS than in MH medium) reflect the 10 4 -fold difference previously observed between MIC (0.094 g/ml) and MBEC (Ͼ512 g/ml) values for NH57388A in vitro (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colistin acts through positively charged electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), facilitating membrane disruption. The observed lowering of the efficacy of colistin in AS medium, therefore, may not only be related to an altered growth rate in this environment (which mimics growth conditions in the CF lung), but also may be due to LPS modification and/or direct binding by mucin in the AS medium, effectively sequestering free antibiotic (41). This EPS effect, and the apparent differences in MICs for colistin-treated NH57388A (with MIC values 4 times greater in AS than in MH medium) reflect the 10 4 -fold difference previously observed between MIC (0.094 g/ml) and MBEC (Ͼ512 g/ml) values for NH57388A in vitro (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the observed ELF concentrations in the current study after inhalation were Ͼ64ϫ MIC, the interaction between colistin and pulmonary surfactant was assumed to be negligible. On the contrary, following intravenous administration, colistin exposure in the ELF was minimal, and below 2.21 mg/liter (limit of quantification [LOQ]), the inhibitory effect of pulmonary surfactant is dramatic and should be considered (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3B), whereas CMS may be more restricted to the ELF along with colistin immediately after its formation. Furthermore, colistin has been shown to bind strongly to mucin in lung fluids, thus limiting its antimicrobial activity (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%