2017
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2017.378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MUC1 induces acquired chemoresistance by upregulating ABCB1 in EGFR-dependent manner

Abstract: Chemoresistance contributes to cancer relapse and increased mortality in a variety of cancer types, raising a pressing need to better understand the underlying mechanism. MUC1 is abnormally overexpressed in numerous carcinomas and associated with poor prognosis. However, the functional significance of MUC1 in chemoresistance has not been fully elucidated. Here, we showed that MUC1 expression was considerably induced in cells that had acquired chemoresistance at both transcriptional and post-translational level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Western blotting demonstrated that downregulation of LRIG1 or upregulation of miR‐20a significantly enhanced EGFR activity, and increased p‐AKT (phospho‐AKT) and p‐ERK1/2 (phospho‐ERK1/2) protein expression (Figure D). In addition, P‐gp and Bcl‐2, as important downstream molecules of EGFR signal, were remarkably increased after LRIG1 knockdown or miR‐20a upregulation . Taken together, these results indicated that the miR‐20a/LRIG1 axis might regulate GC cell drug resistance by increasing EGFR activity and through secondary accelerating PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways (Figure E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Western blotting demonstrated that downregulation of LRIG1 or upregulation of miR‐20a significantly enhanced EGFR activity, and increased p‐AKT (phospho‐AKT) and p‐ERK1/2 (phospho‐ERK1/2) protein expression (Figure D). In addition, P‐gp and Bcl‐2, as important downstream molecules of EGFR signal, were remarkably increased after LRIG1 knockdown or miR‐20a upregulation . Taken together, these results indicated that the miR‐20a/LRIG1 axis might regulate GC cell drug resistance by increasing EGFR activity and through secondary accelerating PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways (Figure E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Nuclear MUC-1-C binds ERα, thus attenuating Tamoxifen induced changes on ERα dependent transcription [20]. As a second mechanism, cell surface MUC-1 directly interacts with receptor tyrosine kinases and may also interfere with their downstream pathways [21,22,23]. In line with this, anti-MUC1 antibodies have already been shown to inhibit EGF receptor signaling in cancer cells [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently reported that erlotinib could enhance the sensitivity of MUC1-expressing cancer cells to paclitaxel 30 . We extended the study by investigating whether paclitaxel-induced CSC enrichment could be affected by erlotinib.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%