Abstract:Plant interactions are as important belowground as aboveground. Belowground plant interactions are however inherently difficult to quantify, as roots of different species are difficult to disentangle. Although for a couple of decades molecular techniques have been successfully applied to quantify root abundance, root identification and quantification in multispecies plant communities remains particularly challenging. Here we present a novel methodology, multispecies genotyping by sequencing (msGBS), as a next … Show more
“…Studying the extent to which the behaviour of the roots of species inhabiting plant communities changes as a function of the order of arrival of plants, as well as studying how these plastic root responses would be reflected at the community level, requires information on the distribution of roots at the species level, which unfortunately was not available in our study. Given the above, as well the inherent limitations of any rhizobox experiment, we see two main avenues for future research aimed at better understanding the roles played by priority effects in root dynamics and their consequences for species coexistence: (1) non-destructively monitoring root development at different soil depths in the field using minirhizotrons (Rewald and Ephrath, 2013;Freschet et al, 2020), and (2) quantifying species relative abundance in root samples taken from plant communities at different soil depths using state-of-the-art molecular techniques (Wagemaker et al, 2021). Only by going underground can we improve our mechanistic understanding of priority effects in plant communities and their implications for species coexistence.…”
The order of arrival of plant species during assembly can affect the structure and functioning of grassland communities. These so-called priority effects have been extensively studied aboveground, but we still do not know how they affect the vertical distribution of roots in the soil and the rooting depth of plant communities. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated the order of arrival of three plant functional groups (forbs, grasses and legumes) in a rhizobox experiment. Priority effects were created by sowing one functional group 10 days before the other two. Rhizoboxes in which all functional groups were sown simultaneously were used as controls. During the experiment, the mean rooting depth of plant communities was monitored using image analysis and a new methodological approach using deep learning (RootPainter) for root segmentation. At harvest, we measured aboveground (community and species level) and belowground (community level) biomass, and assessed the vertical distribution of the root biomass in different soil layers. At the community level, all scenarios where one functional group was sown before the other two had similar shoot and root productivity. At the species level, two forbs (Achillea millefolium and Centaurea jacea) benefited from arriving early, and one legume (Trifolium pratense) had a disadvantage when it was sown after the grasses. Priority effect treatments also affected the vertical distribution of roots. When grasses were sown first, plant communities rooted more shallowly than when forbs or legumes were sown first,. In addition, roots moved down the soil profile 24% more slowly in grasses-first communities. Our results highlight that plant functional group order of arrival in grassland communities can affect the vertical distribution of roots in the soil and this may have implications for species coexistence.
“…Studying the extent to which the behaviour of the roots of species inhabiting plant communities changes as a function of the order of arrival of plants, as well as studying how these plastic root responses would be reflected at the community level, requires information on the distribution of roots at the species level, which unfortunately was not available in our study. Given the above, as well the inherent limitations of any rhizobox experiment, we see two main avenues for future research aimed at better understanding the roles played by priority effects in root dynamics and their consequences for species coexistence: (1) non-destructively monitoring root development at different soil depths in the field using minirhizotrons (Rewald and Ephrath, 2013;Freschet et al, 2020), and (2) quantifying species relative abundance in root samples taken from plant communities at different soil depths using state-of-the-art molecular techniques (Wagemaker et al, 2021). Only by going underground can we improve our mechanistic understanding of priority effects in plant communities and their implications for species coexistence.…”
The order of arrival of plant species during assembly can affect the structure and functioning of grassland communities. These so-called priority effects have been extensively studied aboveground, but we still do not know how they affect the vertical distribution of roots in the soil and the rooting depth of plant communities. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated the order of arrival of three plant functional groups (forbs, grasses and legumes) in a rhizobox experiment. Priority effects were created by sowing one functional group 10 days before the other two. Rhizoboxes in which all functional groups were sown simultaneously were used as controls. During the experiment, the mean rooting depth of plant communities was monitored using image analysis and a new methodological approach using deep learning (RootPainter) for root segmentation. At harvest, we measured aboveground (community and species level) and belowground (community level) biomass, and assessed the vertical distribution of the root biomass in different soil layers. At the community level, all scenarios where one functional group was sown before the other two had similar shoot and root productivity. At the species level, two forbs (Achillea millefolium and Centaurea jacea) benefited from arriving early, and one legume (Trifolium pratense) had a disadvantage when it was sown after the grasses. Priority effect treatments also affected the vertical distribution of roots. When grasses were sown first, plant communities rooted more shallowly than when forbs or legumes were sown first,. In addition, roots moved down the soil profile 24% more slowly in grasses-first communities. Our results highlight that plant functional group order of arrival in grassland communities can affect the vertical distribution of roots in the soil and this may have implications for species coexistence.
“…However, both methods have a relatively low throughput and require a labour‐intensive calibration that prevents their use in species‐rich mixtures (Rewald et al, 2012 ). Recently, a new high‐throughput next generation sequencing‐based method was developed to quantify species proportions in mixed root samples (Wagemaker et al, 2021 ). This method, referred to as multispecies genotyping by sequencing (msGBS), proved to be as accurate as the PCR‐based method of (Mommer et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Opportunity For Improvement Of Cover Crop Root Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also more sensitive and less labour‐intensive. In addition, it does not require the development of species‐specific DNA primers, which makes it possible to analyse root samples collected from species‐rich polycultures and measure traits such as rooting depth for each species individually (in‘t Zandt et al, 2020 ; Wagemaker et al, 2021 ). Root phenotyping in polycultures can also be facilitated using crop lines that were genetically modified to express a green or red fluorescent protein (Faget, Nagel, et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Opportunity For Improvement Of Cover Crop Root Traitsmentioning
Roots are the interface between the plant and the soil and play a central role in multiple ecosystem processes. With intensification of agricultural practices, rhizosphere processes are being disrupted and are causing degradation of the physical, chemical and biotic properties of soil. However, cover crops, a group of plants that provide ecosystem services, can be utilised during fallow periods or used as an intercrop to restore soil health. The effectiveness of ecosystem services provided by cover crops varies widely as very little breeding has occurred in these species.Improvement of ecosystem service performance is rarely considered as a breeding trait due to the complexities and challenges of belowground evaluation. Advancements in root phenotyping and genetic tools are critical in accelerating ecosystem service improvement in cover crops. In this study, we provide an overview of the range of belowground ecosystem services provided by cover crop roots: (1) soil structural remediation, (2) capture of soil resources and (3) maintenance of the rhizosphere and building of organic matter content. Based on the ecosystem services described, we outline current and promising phenotyping technologies and breeding strategies in cover crops that can enhance agricultural sustainability through improvement of root traits.
“…This is particularly true for approaches relying on root observation windows (rhizoboxes) and minirhizotrons, 3D imaging, plant modelling, or (un)targeted metabolomics. Results from our survey also highlighted the popularity of next generation sequencing-based methods in root phenotyping, which have become methods of choice to characterise the plant and soil-associated microbiota (Schöler et al ., 2017) as well as to quantify the relative abundance of plant species in mixed root samples (Wagemaker et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Free Open-access and High-performance Root Image Analysis So...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include image-based approaches using scanners, cameras and microscopes, as well as chemical abundance measurements based on infrared gas analysis, chromatography and mass spectrometry (van Dam & Bouwmeester, 2016; Atkinson et al ., 2019; Wasson et al ., 2020). Next-generation sequencing-based methods have also become very popular for characterising root-associated microbiota (Hannula et al ., 2021) and quantifying species proportions in mixed root samples (Wagemaker et al ., 2021). The diversity of approaches used in root phenotyping is illustrated in Fig.…”
Root phenotyping describes methods for measuring root properties, or traits. While root phenotyping can be challenging, it is advancing quickly. In order for the field to move forward, it is essential to understand the current state and challenges of root phenotyping, as well as the pressing needs of the root biology community. In this letter, we present and discuss the results of a survey that was created and disseminated by members of the Graduate Student and Postdoc Ambassador Program at the 11th symposium of the International Society of Root Research. This survey aimed to (1) provide an overview of the objectives, biological models and methodological approaches used in root phenotyping studies, and (2) identify the main limitations currently faced by plant scientists with regard to root phenotyping. Our survey highlighted that (1) monocotyledonous crops dominate the root phenotyping landscape, (2) root phenotyping is mainly used to quantify morphological and architectural root traits, (3) 2D root scanning/imaging is the most widely used root phenotyping technique, (4) time-consuming tasks are an important barrier to root phenotyping, (5) there is a need for standardised, high-throughput methods to sample and phenotype roots, particularly under field conditions, and to improve our understanding of trait-function relationships.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.