MSF experiences of providing multidisciplinary primary level NCD care for Syrian refugees and the host population in Jordan: an implementation study guided by the RE-AIM framework

Abstract

Background In response to the rising global NCD burden, humanitarian actors have rapidly scaled-up NCD services in crisis-affected low-and-middle income countries. Using the RE-AIM implementation framework, we evaluated a multidisciplinary, primary level model of NCD care for Syrian refugees and vulnerable Jordanians delivered by MSF in Irbid, Jordan. We examined the programme’s Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption and acceptance, Implementation and Maintenance over time. Methods This mixed methods retrospective evaluation, undertaken in 2017, comprised secondary analysis of pre-existing cross-sectional household survey data; analysis of routine cohort data from 2014 to 2017; descriptive costing analysis of total annual, per-patient and per-consultation costs for 2015–2017 from the provider-perspective; a clinical audit; a medication adherence survey; and qualitative research involving thematic analysis of individual interviews and focus group discussions. Results The programme enrolled 23% of Syrian adult refugees with NCDs in Irbid governorate. The cohort mean age was 54.7 years; 71% had multi-morbidity and 9.9% self-reported a disability. The programme was acceptable to patients, staff and stakeholders. Blood pressure and glycaemic control improved as the programme matured and by 6.6 mmHg and 1.12 mmol/l respectively within 6 months of patient enrolment. Per patient per year cost increased 23% from INT$ 1424 (2015) to 1751 (2016), and by 9% to 1904 (2017). Cost per consultation increased from INT$ 209 to 253 (2015–2017). Staff reported that clinical guidelines were usable and patients’ self-reported medication adherence was high. Individual, programmatic and organisational challenges to programme implementation and maintenance included the impact of war and the refugee experience on Syrian refugees’ ability to engage; inadequate low-cost referral options; and challenges for MSF to rapidly adapt to operating in a highly regulated and complex health system. Essential programme adaptations included refinement of health education, development of mental health and psychosocial services and addition of essential referral pathways, home visit, physiotherapy and social worker services. Conclusion RE-AIM proved a valuable tool in evaluating a complex intervention in a protracted humanitarian crisis setting. This multidisciplinary programme was largely acceptable, achieving good clinical outcomes, but for a limited number of patients and at relatively high cost. We propose that model simplification, adapted procurement practices and use of technology could improve cost effectiveness without reducing acceptability, and may facilitate replication.

Fixed dose combination drugs for cardiovascular disease in a prolonged humanitarian crisis in Lebanon: an implementation study

“…We note that medication was also provided free-of-charge to patients by MSF, which would have facilitated retention in care and adherence. There is ample evidence showing that NCD patients in Lebanon and Jordan prioritise a regular medication supply over other elements of care, and that access to consistent, affordable NCD medications remains challenging 50 51. In addition, during the study period, MSF decided to close their clinics for operational reasons, and to transfer the patient cohort to MoPH-accredited primary care clinics receiving NCD medications via the YMCA (Young Men’s Christian Association, which was working with the MoPH and WHO to supply medications to the MoPH-accredited primary care network).…”

Implementing (and evaluating) peer support with people living with noncommunicable diseases in humanitarian settings

“…PLWNCDs in humanitarian settings often adapt their care-seeking to obtain their required medicines and treatment from different sources. Despite this resourcefulness, it becomes increasingly challenging to maintain self-care in the face of disrupted systems ( McNatt et al, 2019 ; Ansbro et al, 2021 ). This may materialise in dilemmas around following healthy living advice - developed in more stable settings - in the face of chronic food shortages, aid dependency, and lack of access to safe public or domestic spaces ( Carruth et al, 2020 ).…”

Strengthening the primary care workforce to deliver high-quality care for non-communicable diseases in refugee settings: lessons learnt from a UNHCR partnership

“…Further qualitative research on facilitators and barriers experienced by HCWs to improve care for NCDs in different settings is needed. 36 Additionally, we would recommend following participants more formally using knowledge and skills testing after 6 months and 12 months to guide the need for refresher training, although high turnover of clinical staff and ongoing funding and supervision are challenges that need to be considered to achieve this. Questions on how the training has changed practice over time, and what services and clinical guidelines have been implemented following training may be more informative.…”