2004
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MS1, MS2, and SQT—three unified, compact, and easily parsed file formats for the storage of shotgun proteomic spectra and identifications

Abstract: As the speed with which proteomic labs generate data increases along with the scale of projects they are undertaking, the resulting data storage and data processing problems will continue to challenge computational resources. This is especially true for shotgun proteomic techniques that can generate tens of thousands of spectra per instrument each day. One design factor leading to many of these problems is caused by storing spectra and the database identifications for a given spectrum as individual files. Whil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
316
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
316
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Protein identification and quantification and analysis were done with Integrated Proteomics Pipeline -IP2 (Integrated Proteomics Applications, Inc., www.integratedproteomics.com/) using ProLuCID, DTASelect2, Census, and QuantCompare. Spectrum raw files were extracted into ms1 and ms2 files from raw files using RawExtract 1.9.9 (http://fields.scripps.edu/downloads.php) (103), and the tandem mass spectra were searched against the European Bioinformatic Institute (IPI) mouse protein database (www.ebi.ac.uk/IPI/IPImouse.html, downloaded on January 1, 2009). To estimate peptide probabilities and FDRs accurately, we used a target/decoy database containing the reversed sequences of all the proteins appended to the target database (104).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein identification and quantification and analysis were done with Integrated Proteomics Pipeline -IP2 (Integrated Proteomics Applications, Inc., www.integratedproteomics.com/) using ProLuCID, DTASelect2, Census, and QuantCompare. Spectrum raw files were extracted into ms1 and ms2 files from raw files using RawExtract 1.9.9 (http://fields.scripps.edu/downloads.php) (103), and the tandem mass spectra were searched against the European Bioinformatic Institute (IPI) mouse protein database (www.ebi.ac.uk/IPI/IPImouse.html, downloaded on January 1, 2009). To estimate peptide probabilities and FDRs accurately, we used a target/decoy database containing the reversed sequences of all the proteins appended to the target database (104).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trichloroacetic acid-precipitated proteins were urea-denatured, reduced, alkylated, and digested with endoproteinase Lys-C (Roche Applied Science) followed by modified trypsin (Roche Applied Science) as described (40). Peptide mixtures were loaded onto 100-m fused silica microcapillary columns packed with 5-m C 18 reverse-phase (Aqua, Phenomenex), strong cation-exchange (PartiSphere SCX, Whatman), and reverse-phase particles (42). Loaded microcapillary columns were placed in-line with an Agilent 1100 series quaternary high pressure liquid chromatography pump and an LTQ ion trap mass spectrometer equipped with a nano-liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization source (Thermo Finnigan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precursor ions were required to fall within 1.25 m/z of the position expected from their average masses, and fragment ions were required to fall within 0.5 m/z of their monoisotopic positions. The database searches produced raw identifications in SQT file format (spectral data SEQUEST search results) (41).…”
Section: Lc-ms-ms Analyses-mentioning
confidence: 99%