2006
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mRNPs take shape by CLIPPING and PAIRING

Abstract: The interaction of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) with RNA is a crucial aspect of normal cellular metabolism. Yet, the diverse number of RBPs and RNA motifs to which they bind, the wide range of interaction strengths and the fact that RBPs associate in dynamic complexes have made it challenging to determine whether a particular RNA-binding protein binds a particular RNA. Recent work by three different laboratories has led to the development of new tools to query such interactions in the more physiological environ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include pull-down assays with homoribopolymers [15, 21, 49, 50], affinity capture using biotinylated RNA [21, 41, 5153], affinity capture using immobilized protein [16], UV crosslinking [21, 49], filter-binding assays [22, 30, 41], electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) [26, 36, 40, 42, 47, 54], and agarose electrophoretic mobility shift assays (AGESA) [17, 41]. Each of these methods has its unique experimental advantages [55]. Acknowledging that binding between a nucleic acid and RNA-binding protein (RBP) can be affected by differences in posttranslational modification [56] and/or differences between different protein variants [57, 58] our working hypothesis is that given a particular RBP, a particular RNA and a defined buffer each of these methods should converge to produce a common answer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include pull-down assays with homoribopolymers [15, 21, 49, 50], affinity capture using biotinylated RNA [21, 41, 5153], affinity capture using immobilized protein [16], UV crosslinking [21, 49], filter-binding assays [22, 30, 41], electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) [26, 36, 40, 42, 47, 54], and agarose electrophoretic mobility shift assays (AGESA) [17, 41]. Each of these methods has its unique experimental advantages [55]. Acknowledging that binding between a nucleic acid and RNA-binding protein (RBP) can be affected by differences in posttranslational modification [56] and/or differences between different protein variants [57, 58] our working hypothesis is that given a particular RBP, a particular RNA and a defined buffer each of these methods should converge to produce a common answer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of RBPs associated with an mRNA could significantly improve our understanding of processes underlying their posttranscriptional regulation. Diverse genetic, microscopic, biochemical and bioinformatics methods have been used to identify proteins involved in mRNA regulation (reviewed in [9][10][11] ). However, only a few of these methods enable the identification of proteins associated with a particular target mRNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%