MRI Radiomics and Predictive Models in Assessing Ischemic Stroke Outcome—A Systematic Review

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, resulting in substantial socio-economic burden for healthcare systems. With advances in artificial intelligence, visual image information can be processed into numerous quantitative features in an objective, repeatable and high-throughput fashion, in a process known as radiomics analysis (RA). Recently, investigators have attempted to apply RA to stroke neuroimaging in the hope of promoting personalized precision medicine. This review aimed to evaluate the role of RA as an adjuvant tool in the prognosis of disability after stroke. We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed and Embase using the keywords: ‘magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)’, ‘radiomics’, and ‘stroke’. The PROBAST tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Radiomics quality score (RQS) was also applied to evaluate the methodological quality of radiomics studies. Of the 150 abstracts returned by electronic literature research, 6 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Five studies evaluated predictive value for different predictive models (PMs). In all studies, the combined PMs consisting of clinical and radiomics features have achieved the best predictive performance compared to PMs based only on clinical or radiomics features, the results varying from an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75–0.86) to an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97). The median RQS of the included studies was 15, reflecting a moderate methodological quality. Assessing the risk of bias using PROBAST, potential high risk of bias in participants selection was identified. Our findings suggest that combined models integrating both clinical and advanced imaging variables seem to better predict the patients’ disability outcome group (favorable outcome: modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 2 and unfavorable outcome: mRS > 2) at three and six months after stroke. Although radiomics studies’ findings are significant in research field, these results should be validated in multiple clinical settings in order to help clinicians to provide individual patients with optimal tailor-made treatment.

Radiomics Analysis for Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review with Radiomics Quality Scoring

“…The same is true for the median RQS value, which was found to be 10 in our study, comparable to values shown by other published systematic reviews. Such examples include a maximum of 22 in studies of hepatocellular carcinoma [ 49 ] and a maximum of 16 in studies of ischemic strokes [ 50 ].…”

Role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease

“…Such measures may allow future clinicians to determine disease severity earlier in the management of IS patients. Multiple studies have demonstrated efforts to develop ML algorithms that can predict functional outcomes at various stages post-discharge (Forkert et al, 2015;Dragoș et al, 2023;Ozkara et al, 2023). Although the success of these studies is somewhat limited, it shows great promise for the future of IS care.…”

A comprehensive review for artificial intelligence on neuroimaging in rehabilitation of ischemic stroke

“…Despite the detailed content, it did not address the prognosis of stroke patients, which is precisely the focal point of concern for most clinical professionals and patients. Ragoș et al ( 13 ) summarized the evaluation of ischemic stroke outcomes using MRI radiomics and predictive models. However, relying solely on radiomic evaluation is too narrow, and the described imaging methods are not comprehensive enough.…”